Religion

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)

50. Some form of animism?

Reply to guillaumeb (Reply #46)

Thu Oct 26, 2017, 12:57 PM

Oct 2017

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

129 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mask laws and anti-religious bigotry [View all] guillaumeb Oct 2017 OP

Why do you keep jumping to a new OP all the time? Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2017 #1

That's just his thing. trotsky Oct 2017 #2

Still waiting for the links about demons. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #22

I gave you links that proved exactly what I claimed, guillaumeb. trotsky Oct 2017 #26

You mistated your previous, unproven claim. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #30

This is for everyone else, not you. trotsky Oct 2017 #35

And so on, in circles and circles Lordquinton Oct 2017 #38

Brilliant? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #39

Yes, we all know you have your own definitions Lordquinton Oct 2017 #43

Right. Based on your responses, guillaumeb Oct 2017 #49

Yep, I clicked the links Lordquinton Oct 2017 #51

What is happening here? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #52

A reminder. trotsky Oct 2017 #57

And did you ever provide the proof in the thread? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #59

Yep, I did. trotsky Oct 2017 #61

Provide that proof, or the link. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #63

He literally did in the post I quoted Lordquinton Oct 2017 #66

And the choir is in perfect harmony. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #71

So... you got nothing Lordquinton Oct 2017 #72

As I said, the choir is in harmony. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #73

Well of course it is. trotsky Oct 2017 #76

Thanks for that confirmation of my statement Lordquinton Oct 2017 #108

Always good when the choir sings in perfect harmony. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #113

Oh I see. trotsky Oct 2017 #69

Your posts reveal much about you. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #74

Yes, they do. As do yours. trotsky Oct 2017 #75

LMFAO trotsky Oct 2017 #45

This is why Tom Lehrer retired Lordquinton Oct 2017 #53

I just like seeing him further drag his own reputation and credibility down into the shitpile. trotsky Oct 2017 #60

Based on the confused responses to several of my posts, apparently not. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #11

NC has anti-mask laws, historically related to KKK activity struggle4progress Oct 2017 #3

True, and the KKK is a recognized hate group. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #7

None of our anti-mask laws mention any group; and 14-12.7 is written in great generality struggle4progress Oct 2017 #25

If the law is written with security in mind, guillaumeb Oct 2017 #29

Here's the actual text of Bill 62 struggle4progress Oct 2017 #33

And from the law: guillaumeb Oct 2017 #34

Wrong. Marois' law was EvilAL Oct 2017 #83

This message was self-deleted by its author EvilAL Oct 2017 #84

Marois' prposed law was discriminatory. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #85

You'd gave a point if EvilAL Oct 2017 #87

And you miss the point with this line of argument. eom guillaumeb Oct 2017 #89

I missed the point about marois? EvilAL Oct 2017 #99

"institutions have the right to enforce certain rules" trotsky Oct 2017 #4

Oopsie... MineralMan Oct 2017 #5

Except an entire country is not a private institution. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #8

Quebec isn't a country. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #13

Quebec is a province with aspirations to be a country. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #15

Zut Alors! MineralMan Oct 2017 #20

Read the PQ platform. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #21

What is that to me? MineralMan Oct 2017 #23

Sarah Palin can see Canada from Minnesota. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #24

You didn't say it had to be a private institution. trotsky Oct 2017 #27

Reread the original post. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #31

Here it is for everyone to read. trotsky Oct 2017 #36

A mosque is a private institution. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #41

"institutions have the right to enforce certain rules." trotsky Oct 2017 #44

Not amending, simply clarifying for those who are obviously confused guillaumeb Oct 2017 #48

Yes, you must have been obviously confused since you didn't distinguish between them. trotsky Oct 2017 #55

So you are saying that every statement must be vetted by a lawyer? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #56

Jesus fucking Christ. trotsky Oct 2017 #58

A nice side step. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #62

wait, so rather than admit you were wrong about anti-mask laws in the other thread you started this Voltaire2 Oct 2017 #6

can you not follow multiple threads? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #9

JFCOAPS Voltaire2 Oct 2017 #17

I stand by my assertion. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #19

You see, this thread is about this specific angle of the argument Lordquinton Oct 2017 #40

Admit I was wrong? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #10

It's clear what you're doing here. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #12

Out argued? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #14

Our faces are part of our identity. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #16

If it were security related, guillaumeb Oct 2017 #18

Why are you belaboring a point I already made? AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #28

To your final comment: guillaumeb Oct 2017 #32

I understand they'll be voting on it next session. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #37

See #46. An exception is already written in for heritage. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #47

As proposed or amended proposition at the moment. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #68

So they would remove the crucifixes Lordquinton Oct 2017 #42

The law provides an exception for religious symbols that are part of the heritage guillaumeb Oct 2017 #46

Some form of animism? Lordquinton Oct 2017 #50

Please take another guess. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #54

The heritage of intolerance Lordquinton Oct 2017 #64

Saudi Arabia is an intolerant theocracy. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #65

Again not what I asked Lordquinton Oct 2017 #67

Why do some here fight intolerance with intolerance? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #70

"Why do some here fight intolerance with intolerance?" trotsky Oct 2017 #77

And should we also be intolerant if a group of athists demonstrates intolerance? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #78

LMFAO trotsky Oct 2017 #79

I was not the one arguing that this particular intolerance was acceptable. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #80

That's not an answer to my question, of course. trotsky Oct 2017 #81

Then you should ask the question to which you wish an answer. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #82

HAHAHAHAHA trotsky Oct 2017 #98

Is this an admittance that you could not clarify your question? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #102

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH trotsky Oct 2017 #125

Arguing about whether we should tolerate Nazis Lordquinton Oct 2017 #111

Defend Nazis? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #114

I did read it Lordquinton Oct 2017 #118

And shall you answer the question posted to you? Lordquinton Oct 2017 #110

Your framing is ridiculous, guillaumeb Oct 2017 #115

You're the only one reframing Lordquinton Oct 2017 #119

You'd be the one to answer that Lordquinton Oct 2017 #109

That question has been asked and answered many times. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #116

bigotry.. lol EvilAL Oct 2017 #86

It is legalized discrimination, guillaumeb Oct 2017 #88

if they are allowed to build a church there EvilAL Oct 2017 #90

Okay. I concede that you have convinced yourself. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #91

No. show me where the rules EvilAL Oct 2017 #94

I already did, on the current law and in this case. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #96

I guess I must have missed it. EvilAL Oct 2017 #97

Now, I found an error in my post about the synagogue. EvilAL Oct 2017 #103

I agree. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #105

Well, when Marois was asked about the cross EvilAL Oct 2017 #106

Where does it say in Islam that women have to cover their faces? EvilAL Oct 2017 #92

You have convinced yourself. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #93

let the court decide. EvilAL Oct 2017 #95

Clearly you can't prove that it's actually part of the religion. trotsky Oct 2017 #100

I asked so many times. No use anymore. EvilAL Oct 2017 #101

Bingo. n/t trotsky Oct 2017 #127

It is a source of debate. guillaumeb Oct 2017 #104

There isn't really a debate on there. EvilAL Oct 2017 #107

Some members believe that FGM is a part of their religion Lordquinton Oct 2017 #112

Do all believers hold identical beliefs? eom guillaumeb Oct 2017 #117

Non-sequitur question Lordquinton Oct 2017 #120

Perhaps you should stop veering off topic guillaumeb Oct 2017 #122

Talking to yourself? Lordquinton Oct 2017 #124

the state when it has a compelling interest to do so. Voltaire2 Oct 2017 #121

And that compelling interest should have a clear relationship guillaumeb Oct 2017 #123

Just like it's a "source of debate" as to whether Christianity is pro-slave or anti-slave. trotsky Oct 2017 #126

true and the funny thing is EvilAL Oct 2017 #128

I only skimmed the link but was getting that impression from it. trotsky Oct 2017 #129