Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LARED

(11,735 posts)
111. Again with your nonsense about what I have stated. Have you no shame? None?
Sun May 6, 2012, 07:28 PM
May 2012

No where have I spouted Christian supremacist nonsense.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Someone should remind General Centraccio that violating the Constitution isn't patriotic. laconicsax May 2012 #1
The general probably doesn't think that injecting God and Christianity darkstar3 May 2012 #5
I have a question for you. cbayer May 2012 #10
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. laconicsax May 2012 #11
No, I am asking why a cross is necessarily considered a religious symbol. cbayer May 2012 #12
Ah, that makes sense. laconicsax May 2012 #13
Now let's be honest. cbayer May 2012 #14
Are you seriously trying to call me out over a 6-month-old post in the Atheists & Agostics group? laconicsax May 2012 #15
No. I asked you a question about how you could make a distinction cbayer May 2012 #16
I answered your question. laconicsax May 2012 #17
I bet most of these folk never knew about the Woonsocket memorial until struggle4progress May 2012 #2
Other than family descendants, you are doubtless correct. rug May 2012 #3
Please get your facts correct. longship May 2012 #6
The "folk from Wisconsin" were helping out a citizen of that town. Goblinmonger May 2012 #7
the "cross" it a great symbol for endless war and slaughter. seems appropriate nt msongs May 2012 #4
RI Attorney General Adds His Support To Keep Memorial Intact struggle4progress May 2012 #8
Wrongness upon wrongness. eqfan592 May 2012 #9
RI Attorney General Adds His Support To Keep Memorial Intact AlbertCat May 2012 #21
Well 90 years ago, no one thought the Constitution was in any danger LARED May 2012 #18
Christian privilage is on full display here in this post. (nt) eqfan592 May 2012 #19
Thanks goodness after 90 years someone is putting those LARED May 2012 #29
Do you deny that Christians enjoy a privileged status in this country? laconicsax May 2012 #32
No, not at all. Woonsocket is a great place to start crushing LARED May 2012 #33
So violation of the Constitution is alright, so long as the majority is for it? nt Act_of_Reparation May 2012 #52
What violation of the Constitution are you talking about? LARED May 2012 #53
Statistics put atheists at a higher percentage than Jewish in our country. Goblinmonger May 2012 #58
No my point is we should listen ot our courts. nt LARED May 2012 #87
You mean the courts that have more often than not ruled that crosses in public ground such as this.. eqfan592 May 2012 #88
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," Act_of_Reparation May 2012 #89
This may not be a violation. cbayer May 2012 #68
Here's the FFRF's take on it. eqfan592 May 2012 #69
Thanks. Legalese makes me all blurry eyed, so I don't really understand the cbayer May 2012 #71
To be totally fair Goblinmonger May 2012 #72
The local group does call itself the Ocean State Atheists. eqfan592 May 2012 #73
I just saw that post. Goblinmonger May 2012 #75
Are there significant policy differences between the atheist organizations and cbayer May 2012 #74
First off, I just saw the statement from the local atheist org Goblinmonger May 2012 #76
What does it mean to put human concerns/morals above divine ones? cbayer May 2012 #82
Yeah, and in the 50s Goblinmonger May 2012 #20
Yeah, and in the 50s AlbertCat May 2012 #22
OK. Things change. I get that. Goblinmonger May 2012 #23
Not sure how that applies to the 1st Amendment issue. AlbertCat May 2012 #24
OK. Reading it in context as a response to LARED and not me Goblinmonger May 2012 #26
I think albert`s post was directed at lared..... opiate69 May 2012 #25
Yeah, that makes it make more sense to me. Goblinmonger May 2012 #27
It is pretty awesome. LARED May 2012 #30
And yet more christian privilage. Truly astounding. (nt) eqfan592 May 2012 #31
Seriously? LARED May 2012 #34
few people care about the atheists concern AlbertCat May 2012 #35
Big +1! (nt) eqfan592 May 2012 #39
I think that your problem is, mr blur May 2012 #36
Nonsense. LARED May 2012 #37
You feel sorry for the folks of Woonsocket? eqfan592 May 2012 #38
I think they value both nt LARED May 2012 #41
Well one has a place in the public square and one doesn't. You can guess which one is which. (nt) eqfan592 May 2012 #42
For 90 years there was no problem with both being in the public square LARED May 2012 #45
If only that were an actually valid argument. (nt) eqfan592 May 2012 #47
I am certain you understand the difference between making an observation and making an argument. LARED May 2012 #48
Indeed I do. I'm glad to see you do as well. (nt) eqfan592 May 2012 #50
Big harm comes from the propagation of the lie that this is a "Christian nation." trotsky May 2012 #56
What bothers me far more than the actual god crap on our money or in the pledge... trotsky May 2012 #40
The facts are the facts LARED May 2012 #43
"The US has been viewed as a Christian nation by it own people for a long long time." trotsky May 2012 #44
How does that work? LARED May 2012 #54
So you believe the United States is a Christian nation, huh? trotsky May 2012 #55
Again the facts are the facts LARED May 2012 #85
What exactly is a "Christian value"? trotsky May 2012 #90
Yes, to a substantial number of people skepticscott May 2012 #91
"cultural supremacists"? Where do you get this stuff from? Don't quit your day job. LARED May 2012 #93
The Founders were a mixed group, they were not all Christians. trotsky May 2012 #95
True, but the reality is that LARED May 2012 #97
Deism isn't remotely Christianity. If anything, it's far closer to a wholesale rejection of it. darkstar3 May 2012 #105
That's nonsense again LARED May 2012 #106
Uh huh... darkstar3 May 2012 #107
Yep I forgot to check for typos before posting. Got me. Also please stop putting words in my LARED May 2012 #108
Nonsense. trotsky May 2012 #109
Again with your nonsense about what I have stated. Have you no shame? None? LARED May 2012 #111
Replace "no where" with "everywhere" and you've got a true statement. trotsky May 2012 #112
Tell you what, show where I have spouted Christian Supremacy and I'll LARED May 2012 #113
Well I suppose I could collect a link to every post you've made in these last few threads... trotsky May 2012 #114
So you don't care that your country's founders, mr blur May 2012 #57
Wow a quote. And I completely agree with him LARED May 2012 #86
A nation of mostly christians does not a christian nation make. cleanhippie May 2012 #92
Why not? nt LARED May 2012 #94
It's been explained to you several times in this thread alone. cleanhippie May 2012 #96
So the US is a white nation? n/t Goblinmonger May 2012 #98
I was not aware that one's pigmentation LARED May 2012 #100
No, but you are saying that we are a Christian nation because most people are Christian. Goblinmonger May 2012 #102
At least your desire for a theocracy Goblinmonger May 2012 #59
Cool, another guy making up his own definitions for words. I think I'll try, that it must make LARED May 2012 #99
How did I make anything up. Goblinmonger May 2012 #101
Look up Theocrat in Websters first. You obviously are using a different definition. LARED May 2012 #103
I can't get past the bullshit of what you are saying, frankly. Goblinmonger May 2012 #104
Try this LARED May 2012 #110
Seriously? sakabatou May 2012 #84
Uh, how is this an attack on the Constitution? progressoid May 2012 #28
It was more like the constitution was ignored... rexcat May 2012 #46
So it took us something 200 years to figure out what the Constitution really means LARED May 2012 #49
Something being "ignored" and something having it's meaning figured out are two different things. eqfan592 May 2012 #51
The problem is they don't have the ability to understand the difference between Leontius May 2012 #78
Yeah, you've sure got us figured out, Leontius. eqfan592 May 2012 #80
I really did not expect you to understand my post... rexcat May 2012 #83
... FFRF's President tells Eyewitness News that the city's battle is premature. "We have not sent struggle4progress May 2012 #60
Oh Noes. FFRF used the word "hysterical" Goblinmonger May 2012 #62
R.I., not national, American Legion will pay to repair Woonsocket cross war memorial struggle4progress May 2012 #61
That doesn't make it any better. Goblinmonger May 2012 #63
The blowhards are certainly swarming struggle4progress May 2012 #64
A person living there filed a complaint and asked for the FFRF's help. (nt) eqfan592 May 2012 #65
Pesky facts. Always getting in the way Goblinmonger May 2012 #67
Stop with the misinformation. FFRF "chimed in" because a resident OF THAT TOWN asked them to. Goblinmonger May 2012 #66
I'm kinda wonderin if this mysterious and anonymous person, who so suddenly struggle4progress May 2012 #70
Who said the person "suddenly discovered" the memorial to be offensive? eqfan592 May 2012 #77
The dates testify to the suddenness. The monument was originally dedicated 90+ years ago, and it was struggle4progress May 2012 #79
That doesn't really address my point. eqfan592 May 2012 #81
More Woonsocket history struggle4progress May 2012 #115
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Hundreds rally to defend ...»Reply #111