Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Why religion is invulnerable: [View all]

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
29. "Excuses, eh?"
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 02:03 PM
Nov 2017

Thank you, DetlefK, excuses are just words of surrender. Surrender is not in my DNA. "We'll fight, you'll see".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why religion is invulnerable: [View all] DetlefK Nov 2017 OP
I am flabbergasted! ExciteBike66 Nov 2017 #1
We've mentioned him a few times here: muriel_volestrangler Nov 2017 #112
Oh never mind gibraltar72 Nov 2017 #2
It is so comforting to think of an afterlife and a god Farmer-Rick Nov 2017 #3
It also constantly re-enforces itself with the teaching that Christ will come back again... brush Nov 2017 #78
Belief Cartoonist Nov 2017 #4
You have no proof or knowledge of what happens to our "self" after death. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #5
No one has proof Cartoonist Nov 2017 #6
And yet you believe something you can't prove. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #7
My proof is your lack of proof Cartoonist Nov 2017 #8
Here is your circular argument. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #10
Wrong word Cartoonist Nov 2017 #11
One absolute that needs to be remembered: SCantiGOP Nov 2017 #12
Wrong again. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #14
Show me Cartoonist Nov 2017 #16
Do you have any kind of insurance? yallerdawg Nov 2017 #18
So metaphoric language is your proof. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #19
Yes. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #23
You do know Lovecraft was an atheist. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #28
So proof of a loving God marylandblue Nov 2017 #34
This OP is regarding an SF writer and "fictional" quotes. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #37
No, it is not literal Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #46
Acts of God is definitely not literal in the legal sense marylandblue Nov 2017 #48
"Acts of God" are legally defined. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #51
Correct, but the term itself is metaphorical for natural disasters marylandblue Nov 2017 #52
As everyone knows... yallerdawg Nov 2017 #58
When you are cold and dead marylandblue Nov 2017 #60
Faith offers hope and love. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #61
Atheism will never be as comforting as religion marylandblue Nov 2017 #64
An atheist cannot offer love? Are you kidding me? Doodley Nov 2017 #152
OK. Just to be clear. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #62
Everyone - EVERYONE - knows what "Acts of God" means! yallerdawg Nov 2017 #63
So it's a yes or no answer, and you didn't give either of those. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #65
These are acts not attributable to 'human agency.' yallerdawg Nov 2017 #67
You are the one who used the legal term to support your position. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #71
I gave you an example... yallerdawg Nov 2017 #76
I fully realize the insurance companies know what an Act of God is. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #114
Unless you can show me billions worshipping the days of the week... yallerdawg Nov 2017 #120
I am not annoyed by what the vast majority of humans believe Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #122
TGIF! Lordquinton Nov 2017 #135
And there it is again, the threat from a theist that the horrible unbelievers are going Voltaire2 Nov 2017 #109
It does seem to particularly annoy some people who profess complete disbelief. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #113
It isnt annoying it is comically appalling. Voltaire2 Nov 2017 #126
Good luck. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #73
I hear ya! yallerdawg Nov 2017 #74
Agreed. But the definition of tolerance often does not extend guillaumeb Nov 2017 #75
It's actually easier to talk to those billions of reals believers marylandblue Nov 2017 #83
I was called a "creationist" today by a non-theist. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #85
I only know of my interactions with you marylandblue Nov 2017 #86
So you support people making up their own words. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #89
No I don't support it marylandblue Nov 2017 #90
My actual position is easily researched. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #91
Yes, I've heard many times that your position is clearly found somewhere else marylandblue Nov 2017 #96
Your research skills need some work. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #99
No, my research skills are quite good and always have been marylandblue Nov 2017 #100
Perfection is the ultimate goal. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #101
Now that's an irrational belief marylandblue Nov 2017 #102
No, really. Congratulations. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #103
So this is just another redirection? marylandblue Nov 2017 #104
No one ever called G-man that Lordquinton Nov 2017 #138
Still preaching the same sermon to the same tiny congregation. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #143
You certainly are Lordquinton Nov 2017 #150
My point was that it shouldn't matter to guillameb if they did or didn't call him that marylandblue Nov 2017 #149
I agree with you on that Lordquinton Nov 2017 #151
You are a creationist Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #117
Look up the word "creationist". guillaumeb Nov 2017 #144
Do you believe that there was a creator that created the universe? Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #154
So this OP that drew our comments. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #92
The quote doesn't actually seem to be about religion marylandblue Nov 2017 #93
"Why religion is invulnerable." yallerdawg Nov 2017 #94
You have a point there marylandblue Nov 2017 #95
The "excuses," rationalizations, justifications of the irreligious... yallerdawg Nov 2017 #97
Well for me, my agnosticism/atheism is a matter of lack of evidence marylandblue Nov 2017 #98
do you tolerate nazi opinions? Voltaire2 Nov 2017 #110
By some sources Lordquinton Nov 2017 #137
So the "hope god lets you in to heaven" Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #116
That is not OUR rule. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #121
So that attitude is showing respect and tolerance Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #123
You are not required to believe. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #124
That is where religion becomes intolerant marylandblue Nov 2017 #131
This. Right here. +1,000,000 Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #132
It's not intolerant. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #133
The line between judgemental and intolerant is very fine marylandblue Nov 2017 #148
So you're saying that your arguments can't hold up Lordquinton Nov 2017 #136
Lovecraft was a massive bigot Lordquinton Nov 2017 #134
So you believe that, for example, earthquakes are caused by gods? Voltaire2 Nov 2017 #108
Insurance companies, lawyers and judges do - depending on policies. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #115
Holy shit. NO THEY DON'T BELIEVE GOD CAUSED THOSE. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #118
I asked what you believe. Voltaire2 Nov 2017 #125
I believe they call it "Acts of God" for a reason. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #127
Why do they start with faith instead of evidence? marylandblue Nov 2017 #22
The scientific method. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #24
Fine to start with a question marylandblue Nov 2017 #27
Why would you think that? yallerdawg Nov 2017 #36
I think that because that is my experience with believers marylandblue Nov 2017 #57
Because a question is doubt. The opposite of faith. DetlefK Nov 2017 #77
We question our existence and purpose. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #79
Thank you for confirming that faith is based on confirmation-bias. DetlefK Nov 2017 #82
Again, you want the proof before the faith. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #84
I feel like we should finally define the words we use in our conversation. DetlefK Nov 2017 #107
Amazing Lordquinton Nov 2017 #146
But they find absolute proof in how that faith manifests all around them. Mariana Nov 2017 #25
As you know, there are many paths to truth. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #30
You used the word "proof", did you not? Mariana Nov 2017 #38
"Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." yallerdawg Nov 2017 #41
That is purely tautological. MineralMan Nov 2017 #31
"They find absolute proof." yallerdawg Nov 2017 #39
Like many, you appear not to understand what MineralMan Nov 2017 #40
And so "the God of the Gaps" marches on. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #42
No, not really. MineralMan Nov 2017 #44
The "God of the Gaps" is simply a cop-out and intellectual capitulation. DetlefK Nov 2017 #80
"Why am I here and what purpose do I serve?" yallerdawg Nov 2017 #81
The question presupposes a purpose marylandblue Nov 2017 #88
Why would you ask that question at all? Mariana Nov 2017 #139
If I were a mindless protozoa, I might not ask that question. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #140
Why are you here, and what purpose do you serve? Mariana Nov 2017 #141
I believe we need to be more inclusive and tolerant of each other... yallerdawg Nov 2017 #142
That's crazy. Brainstormy Nov 2017 #128
I would think psychosis would be more attuned to... yallerdawg Nov 2017 #130
A common error on your part. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #145
No error Cartoonist Nov 2017 #153
Oh stop framing the theist position as equally valid. Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #17
No, we're talking about faith here. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #20
Those reports of what happens "after death" Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #26
"Global warming" has been explained by those who deny it. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #33
Those people weren't actually dead marylandblue Nov 2017 #32
You just confirmed... yallerdawg Nov 2017 #35
Millions (I think) believe that immunizations cause autism Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #47
Beliefs are imaginary. MineralMan Nov 2017 #50
"I believe I am going to pick up these dice and roll a 7." yallerdawg Nov 2017 #54
Yes. That is your imagination. MineralMan Nov 2017 #55
Unless yallerdawg cheats marylandblue Nov 2017 #68
Let me think about that for a moment.... MineralMan Nov 2017 #69
Do You Believe in Magic? MineralMan Nov 2017 #59
You need to get to Vegas ASAP. Missn-Hitch Nov 2017 #66
Actually, no. Anyone who can report on "being dead" MineralMan Nov 2017 #43
You died and remember nothing. yallerdawg Nov 2017 #49
Uh, no. I have no "beliefs" about that at all. MineralMan Nov 2017 #53
Something never changes to "nothing". gtar100 Nov 2017 #45
Your atoms will be around forever marylandblue Nov 2017 #87
That's one theory. gtar100 Nov 2017 #105
You argued that materialism supports that consciousness continues to exist after death marylandblue Nov 2017 #106
You're confusing theory and hypothesis Lordquinton Nov 2017 #147
Of course it doesn't Cuthbert Allgood Nov 2017 #119
Typically insightful. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #72
Way beyond "invulnerable!" yallerdawg Nov 2017 #9
unaffiliated percentage will decrease? SCantiGOP Nov 2017 #13
Doesn't defy every assumption marylandblue Nov 2017 #21
Yes unfortunately globally religiosity is increasing while in developed countries it is decreasing. Voltaire2 Nov 2017 #111
Religion as race Cartoonist Nov 2017 #15
Those projections do not assume that religion is genetic Brainstormy Nov 2017 #129
"Excuses, eh?" saidsimplesimon Nov 2017 #29
We're not gonna take it. NOOOOOOOOOO. Iggo Nov 2017 #56
Is it because it's so vulnerable? rock Nov 2017 #70
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Why religion is invulnera...»Reply #29