Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
61. I believe that it is all semantics.
Fri Jan 5, 2018, 12:36 PM
Jan 2018

Some cannot use the word belief to describe something that they actually believe.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You are the only person I know that defines them that way. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #1
This Ohio Dem Jan 2018 #7
Yep. trotsky Jan 2018 #22
I don't fit either definition. Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #40
It's pretty simple. trotsky Jan 2018 #75
What I think caused the heat marylandblue Jan 2018 #2
Beliefs are unprovable. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #30
I'll try this one more time, but I imagine you will fight it. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #33
Rarely am I this blunt in a response - but you are just wrong. bitterross Jan 2018 #153
I am sorry but YOU are just wrong. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #156
What if you just say "I don't know?" marylandblue Jan 2018 #157
Seems that believing in a god is a binary. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #158
Apatheist seems to be someone who doesn't care marylandblue Jan 2018 #159
I think that makes you an agnostic atheist Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #160
That is my point. It is binary. bitterross Jan 2018 #162
Pretty Pictures from the ULC and Wikipedia don't make you right. bitterross Jan 2018 #161
Your definition proves my point. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #163
"1 a : a lack of belief or a strong disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods " Voltaire2 Jan 2018 #164
Yes, I read it. bitterross Jan 2018 #167
Again. You make my point. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #168
Why are beliefs unprovable? marylandblue Jan 2018 #49
You can prove some things, others cannot be proven. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #53
Correct, but marylandblue Jan 2018 #55
Are you asking my opinion? guillaumeb Jan 2018 #59
Some beliefs can be proven. marylandblue Jan 2018 #62
We can, at least prove that butter pecan ice cream exists. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #58
Because if he identified "God does not exist" as a statement marylandblue Jan 2018 #151
Big fan of Eris myself. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #166
She was truly awesome outside the gates of Troy. Voltaire2 Jan 2018 #172
Lack of belief doesn't require proof. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #52
I agree with that, except marylandblue Jan 2018 #69
At some point it does kinda become that. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #79
I'd take it a step further Lordquinton Jan 2018 #173
You are an atheist. Eko Jan 2018 #3
You have made an excellent point! trixie2 Jan 2018 #4
If you have convinced yourself, I understand. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #31
Nope you are. Eko Jan 2018 #137
This was actually the ancient Roman position before Constantine marylandblue Jan 2018 #150
I never wander into the religion topic trixie2 Jan 2018 #5
A cogent and lucid description of my position as well! Thank you! Moostache Jan 2018 #28
How did you arrive at your position? guillaumeb Jan 2018 #45
Do you believe in Huldufolk? trixie2 Jan 2018 #136
Some believe in them. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #174
But do you believe in them? trixie2 Jan 2018 #175
My entire life. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #179
But are you a huldufolkist or an ahuldufolkist? marylandblue Jan 2018 #182
I think it is exactly as Rush's Geddy Lee sings: yallerdawg Jan 2018 #6
Athiesm is just a non belief. Eko Jan 2018 #8
When I was a child, I believed in Santa Claus. yallerdawg Jan 2018 #9
You make a lot of assumptions there. Eko Jan 2018 #10
When I was a young kid, Eko Jan 2018 #11
Good conversation! yallerdawg Jan 2018 #12
Wow, really? Eko Jan 2018 #13
I mean, some people Eko Jan 2018 #14
You do know that the original lyric was trixie2 Jan 2018 #16
"I couldn't care less." I could not care less, IOW. sprinkleeninow Jan 2018 #176
Yes, there is a lot of proselytyzing from one side. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #32
As if calling bald a hair color makes it hair. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #36
I appreciate your efforts to "tone it down" and make it all a more civil conversation... yallerdawg Jan 2018 #54
And I have noticed that when people post here in any positive way about religion, guillaumeb Jan 2018 #56
Rejecting your claim is a form of choice, sure. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #60
I believe that it is all semantics. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #61
Because it's not a belief. It's a lack of belief. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #65
And you can't use belief in God as a statement marylandblue Jan 2018 #152
well we do agree it seems on one thing: your prior attempt was a self inflicted tragedy. Voltaire2 Jan 2018 #15
People that have faith, EvilAL Jan 2018 #17
Amazingly harmonius response with others here. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #34
Notice that you didn't avoid mentioning a choir. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #38
Instead of your 'choir' I liken it to your 'peanut gallery'. 😶 sprinkleeninow Jan 2018 #178
"Philosophical" Act_of_Reparation Jan 2018 #18
It's a common error many theists make. trotsky Jan 2018 #24
This post should be pinned at the top of this forum. Great stuff. n/t Fix The Stupid Jan 2018 #25
I mean to say that understanding what theism and atheism are is very basic philosophy. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2018 #26
Ah, good point. trotsky Jan 2018 #29
what he (or she) said rurallib Jan 2018 #27
Great analogy. Eko Jan 2018 #138
More harmony. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #35
You seem to find it unusual when people are in agreement. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2018 #46
I find it interesting that the same tiny group guillaumeb Jan 2018 #51
I find it interesting a theist using the same arguments... Act_of_Reparation Jan 2018 #66
Not speaking to my point, guillaumeb Jan 2018 #72
I understand your need to feel this way. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2018 #73
Yes, it is. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #74
Oh please. You've been caught doing it plenty. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #81
He did it first!!! guillaumeb Jan 2018 #97
I note that when you say 'most' you seem to actually mean 'me'. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #106
No, I mean "most", as in most. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #111
Don't pretend you have a massive silent, approving audience here. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #112
One can hope, but I do not pretend to such things. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #115
I don't think you notice what you are doing either marylandblue Jan 2018 #148
Come on, man. Admit your own fault in this. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #92
Yup. And people can scroll on back and see that history and how it has evolved over time. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #80
I find it interesting that you deem religion worth defending. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #67
Dude, Eko Jan 2018 #139
That is how YOU define them. There is no "we." MineralMan Jan 2018 #19
Right. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #37
Uff da! More gobbledygook.... MineralMan Jan 2018 #43
How kind of you. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #48
Some may say one reply is too many. Sneederbunk Jan 2018 #154
Some may say many things. MineralMan Jan 2018 #155
We make a choice about your claim. We do not have a 'belief'. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #68
Position and choice Eko Jan 2018 #140
I understand why you don't want to continue the discussion where it started Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #20
More harmony. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #39
Maybe if everyone thinks the same thing about you Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #42
More coincidence. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #47
I've seen this tactic before. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #84
Others who were driven out by the overwhelming negativity. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #86
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #89
"Others who were driven out by the overwhelming negativity." Act_of_Reparation Jan 2018 #99
Speaking of groups, there is also a dedicated group for atheists. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #100
I wouldn't go tugging at that thread. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2018 #101
My point remains. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #102
Because there won't be any theists around to test these claims/issues/whatever. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #108
An excellent point. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #113
You have no point. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2018 #129
I came here for a discussion outside my own echo chamber. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #107
Ockham's razor led me to a different conclusion. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #83
Not if you had used it correctly. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #85
Non-overlapping magesteria. You stick to your faithyness and I'll do the philosophy thing. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #87
Razors can be sharp. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #88
Because this needs to be separate: having speech/language is not a prerequisite to thought. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #21
You can think without language? guillaumeb Jan 2018 #41
Of course you can. Jesus. Really? We need to have this discussion? Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #44
Amazing indeed, that you apparently believe this. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #50
You know you just proved my point, right? Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #57
Can you think without words? No, except for needs. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #71
Of course I can. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #78
We can experience and recognize basic needs and inputs. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #82
Again, not true. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #91
As we learn language, our ability to think and express those thoughts increases. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #94
We agree and disagree Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #119
Humans have a need to communicate. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #121
I will also agree with that. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #123
A predisposition based on our ability. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #125
But you already tripped over the problem. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #126
But we think becasue we have language, and because we have experience. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #130
No. We have language because we think. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #131
No problem, it is a good response. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #132
I don't think Chomsky or I would agree with your second sentence, Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #127
Wrong again. MineralMan Jan 2018 #103
Well, that settles it. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #104
So music does not convey abstract thoughts Voltaire2 Jan 2018 #143
The Great Gig In The Sky. The entirety of Fantasia. Springdanz. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #169
I can think of things that don't have words to express them. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #90
I would ask for an example, but since you have no words for these things, guillaumeb Jan 2018 #95
Can you seriously not conceive of a concept, in the universe, that has no existing name? AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #105
Again, since you cannot give me an example of these unameable things, guillaumeb Jan 2018 #109
How embarrassing for you. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #110
You cannot imagine. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #114
In the 1920's it was postulated that there might be relativistic particles with no mass AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #116
And how do they formulate and examine these abstract concepts? guillaumeb Jan 2018 #118
I don't need words to represent a thing until I need to communicate it to another person. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #124
I agree. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #128
There is a concept in music called tonal color. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #133
Your ear was "aware", but had no langauge to describe it? guillaumeb Jan 2018 #134
Exactly. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #135
You were already given examples already marylandblue Jan 2018 #146
You're right. I suspect many people don't realize how important language is to thinking. Towlie Jan 2018 #63
Of course language influences thinking. That's an intro to semantics course concept. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #64
Yes, we cannot have thoughts of any clarity or coherence without language. That's what I'm saying. Towlie Jan 2018 #70
Feels like now we just have a quibble about "clarity" and "coherence" Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #76
You obviously misunderstood Towlie. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #93
Towlie can speak for themself Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #96
And actually did, in #63. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #98
Yes. Towlie and I were having a discussion. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #117
You could simply admit the obvious. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #120
I have responded to you in our discussion. Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #122
Towlie didn't even understand the movie Arrival. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #171
Arrival (thought I'd keep the two concepts distinct). Cuthbert Allgood Jan 2018 #77
I just watched it last night on Amazon. Voltaire2 Jan 2018 #165
You miss the point of Arrival marylandblue Jan 2018 #147
So how did humans come up with speech Eko Jan 2018 #141
Have you ever heard of Helen Keller? Mariana Jan 2018 #142
There are many people on the autism spectrum Voltaire2 Jan 2018 #144
This assertion that only people who have language Mariana Jan 2018 #145
I guess the important thing is that you have chosen definitions that work for you. trotsky Jan 2018 #23
another great episode of hole digging! Voltaire2 Jan 2018 #149
I'm always impressed by the progress he continues to make when he hits bedrock. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #170
Guillaume, mon ami, I just broke my daisy chain promise to stay outta this sprinkleeninow Jan 2018 #177
You are forgiven. guillaumeb Jan 2018 #180
➕Thank God for His Mercies. They are new every day.➕ sprinkleeninow Jan 2018 #181
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»How do we define theism, ...»Reply #61