Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Faith and Science [View all]

ExciteBike66

(2,700 posts)
14. And the analogy isn't a good one...
Mon Feb 12, 2018, 11:32 AM
Feb 2018

You are distorting what science actually is (well technically the guy you quote does that).

I'm happy you responded though because I wanted to expand on my answer above.


1.) Scientists and faith:

- Scientists cannot just have "faith" in prior scientists' work. This is not how science gets things done. I will use the example in your OP of the speed of light. It is perfectly valid for a modern scientist to make a prediction based upon the speed of light as calculated by prior scientists. However, this is not merely taking the prior measurements on "faith" in the sense of religious faith. If the modern scientist's prediction turns out to be false, he is perfectly at liberty to start to doubt the prior scientist's measurement of the speed of light. Science is only "true" insofar as it is useful. Once a scientific theory/measurement proves to not lead to good predictions, it can be jettisoned. As I state in my original post, it is the essence of science that the biggest discoveries overturn prior "dogmas".


2.) Regular folks and faith in science/scientists:

- I was brief in my prior post about this. Basically, regular folks (i.e. those who are not employed in furthering mankind's knowledge and technology) can believe whatever they want about science. The quoted guy in the OP is correct that most people will not calculate the speed of light on their own, but that is not really relevant to whether or not science is a matter of "faith". Just because I will not personally measure the speed of light doesn't mean I have "faith" that it is a certain mph. Other people have measured the speed of light, and I can see with my own eyes the benefits of said measurements. Whenever my GPS gets me to the right address, I can see the benefits of science. I need no "faith", because science got me to where I wanted to be.

- Your argument that regular people have "faith" in science isn't a very strong one in your case. We can all see the benefits science has brought us through technology, it doesn't require any faith at all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Faith and Science [View all] yallerdawg Feb 2018 OP
It's not faith zipplewrath Feb 2018 #1
You sure have a lot of faith in science! yallerdawg Feb 2018 #3
Trust zipplewrath Feb 2018 #22
From Bing. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #34
All theories from science can be backed up by evidence. BigRig Feb 2018 #2
That is certainly what most of us believe unquestionably. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #5
"hoped for" and "not seen" - so that is *not* what BigRig was saying muriel_volestrangler Feb 2018 #80
If you have faith that something is so... yallerdawg Feb 2018 #81
Because it's drummed into billions from childhood that their eternal fate depends on believing muriel_volestrangler Feb 2018 #82
What about free will? yallerdawg Feb 2018 #83
The huge majority of the world stays with the religion they were taught as children muriel_volestrangler Feb 2018 #84
If it works for the parents, why wouldn't it work for the children? yallerdawg Feb 2018 #85
If it works? edhopper Feb 2018 #87
Did Zeus, Odin, Baal, Osiris, edhopper Feb 2018 #86
This doesn't really prove what you want it to prove. ExciteBike66 Feb 2018 #4
It's called an analogy in regards to our premise of faith. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #11
And the analogy isn't a good one... ExciteBike66 Feb 2018 #14
"We can all see the benefits science has brought us." yallerdawg Feb 2018 #29
The issue isn't that science can't harm us marylandblue Feb 2018 #49
I would go further and state that regardless of whether religion actually helps... ExciteBike66 Feb 2018 #68
I'm still waiting for my god-powered toaster.... ExciteBike66 Feb 2018 #64
There are Jesus toasters, however. longship Feb 2018 #65
Would it be sinful to cover His likeness with jelly? nt ExciteBike66 Feb 2018 #67
You don't need to do that marylandblue Feb 2018 #71
That would be quite a mess! ExciteBike66 Feb 2018 #72
Bullshit argument using an equivocation fallacy. Voltaire2 Feb 2018 #6
Weak sauce, yallerdawg PJMcK Feb 2018 #7
Illogical attempt at analogy.. Permanut Feb 2018 #8
Light speed and Warp speed Cartoonist Feb 2018 #9
You can verify the speed of light fairly easily VMA131Marine Feb 2018 #10
If I studied it real hard so I could comprehend all this... yallerdawg Feb 2018 #12
Lol, "science is hard so it is just like religion"? ExciteBike66 Feb 2018 #15
I'm just pointing out that in reality the vast majority of us live in faith. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #17
Ah, well my other posts have already covered that. ExciteBike66 Feb 2018 #19
That was my point VMA131Marine Feb 2018 #52
Faith in science is not the same at all. sfwriter Feb 2018 #13
That's interesting, but very poor logic. MineralMan Feb 2018 #16
I went with an easier argument myself ExciteBike66 Feb 2018 #18
Well, an even easier argument is available. MineralMan Feb 2018 #20
If someone gives you the figures, anyone can do the math. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #26
Uff da! MineralMan Feb 2018 #27
No, the light was seen long before science explained it. MarvinGardens Feb 2018 #35
Change a few words... yallerdawg Feb 2018 #38
Yeah, you just have to change the word "real".... nt ExciteBike66 Feb 2018 #70
Deities are "incomprehensible" to you. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #21
That's just silly. I comprehend the concept of deities just fine. MineralMan Feb 2018 #24
What a bunch of stupid shit. AtheistCrusader Feb 2018 #23
Scientific theories are falsifiable. MarvinGardens Feb 2018 #25
Scientific theories are falsifiable ... Mariana Feb 2018 #31
Dude, this is just embarrassing. Cuthbert Allgood Feb 2018 #28
Is it impossible for you to look at it from someone else's perspective? yallerdawg Feb 2018 #32
You really don't understand my position. I'm fine with people practicing their faith. I really am. Cuthbert Allgood Feb 2018 #36
Hold on a second. progressoid Feb 2018 #37
Lost me at Dr Ejaz Thyla Feb 2018 #30
What about citing historical religious documents for a basis of any argument? yallerdawg Feb 2018 #33
If you watched the eclipse last summer as millions did marylandblue Feb 2018 #39
What if I trust Muhammad? yallerdawg Feb 2018 #40
Perhaps you could pray for better understanding MineralMan Feb 2018 #41
Maybe God will tell me you're right? yallerdawg Feb 2018 #42
Perhaps, but highly unlikely. MineralMan Feb 2018 #46
Because one is an objective thing that you can see with your eyes marylandblue Feb 2018 #44
I agree. There is one great similarity. PdxSean Feb 2018 #43
Scientists are good and infallible. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #45
That is not what the poster said. MineralMan Feb 2018 #48
You are predictable, that's for sure. Mariana Feb 2018 #51
There you are. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #54
That is not a response to the post. MineralMan Feb 2018 #55
Along those lines, my physics professor demonstrated marylandblue Feb 2018 #47
A very good objective example of the law of gravity. MineralMan Feb 2018 #50
Cool... spicysista Feb 2018 #53
I'm glad you can read it with an open mind. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #59
You can verify the speed of light yourself. Eko Feb 2018 #56
I'm going to take their word for it. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #57
you shouldn't just take their word for it edhopper Feb 2018 #60
Uh-huh. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #62
You are really missing the point here edhopper Feb 2018 #63
If I could verify one miracle in the Bible marylandblue Feb 2018 #74
You don't have to trust them. MineralMan Feb 2018 #61
Well my point is. Eko Feb 2018 #76
My point is... yallerdawg Feb 2018 #77
How you feel about it doesnt matter. Eko Feb 2018 #78
Here is a simple physics lab experiment that MineralMan Feb 2018 #58
You are merely insisting that you believe in nothing. yallerdawg Feb 2018 #66
"Believe in" is not an expression I use. MineralMan Feb 2018 #69
Every bit of your argument... yallerdawg Feb 2018 #73
I don't care what others believe. If they discuss it in public and MineralMan Feb 2018 #75
The same predictable response from the same few non-theists. guillaumeb Feb 2018 #79
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Faith and Science»Reply #14