Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Looking Backward Toward Creation? [View all]

MineralMan

(151,293 posts)
36. That's a common strategy used by true believers.
Fri Mar 2, 2018, 09:28 PM
Mar 2018

The gun-toters use it all the time to attempt to derail discussions. Let a control advocate misuse firearms nomenclature or use a common term not agreed to, and they pounce.

When people run out of arguments, they resort to such diversions. It's boring. When religionists do it, it's just comical.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Looking Backward Toward Creation? [View all] MineralMan Mar 2018 OP
Also new info about dark matter in the article. MarvinGardens Mar 2018 #1
It's a very interesting piece of science. MineralMan Mar 2018 #2
Why assign it intelligence? edhopper Mar 2018 #11
But for the premise MarvinGardens Mar 2018 #19
"I see enough evidence in the ordered structures and natural laws of the universe." trotsky Mar 2018 #20
Maybe not, or maybe we are looking at it right now. MarvinGardens Mar 2018 #23
Apples and oranges. trotsky Mar 2018 #25
The control earth is the one from 150 years ago marylandblue Mar 2018 #26
How are those evidence of a "higher intelligence?" MineralMan Mar 2018 #21
I would agree that it surely doesn't prove it. MarvinGardens Mar 2018 #24
I didn't mention proof, though. MineralMan Mar 2018 #28
But there is ample explanation edhopper Mar 2018 #22
If there is a Watchmaker, he isn't like us. MarvinGardens Mar 2018 #34
Why keep the God hypothesis at all edhopper Mar 2018 #35
Why do you call it Creation? newcriminal Mar 2018 #3
Why not? Have to call it something. MineralMan Mar 2018 #4
It's a word with specific meanings, especially in a religion/science context. newcriminal Mar 2018 #5
We don't know that something changed into something else. MineralMan Mar 2018 #6
Nor do we know that it was created. newcriminal Mar 2018 #7
You should also feel free to use a term you feel is more descriptive marylandblue Mar 2018 #10
It's his own desciption. newcriminal Mar 2018 #12
Just a suggestion, since you seemed to ascribe marylandblue Mar 2018 #13
I didn't ascribe one to him. I asked him. He provided an inadequate answer, I think. newcriminal Mar 2018 #14
Seemed adequate to me, but suit yourself. marylandblue Mar 2018 #15
"Why not? Have to call it something." newcriminal Mar 2018 #16
It's a commonly used word for the phenomenon marylandblue Mar 2018 #17
Certain theists in these discussions love to jump on something like that. trotsky Mar 2018 #33
That's a common strategy used by true believers. MineralMan Mar 2018 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author marylandblue Mar 2018 #9
OFF TOPIC but important question PJMcK Mar 2018 #27
Not until July. Then, I'll turn 73, and be even more ancient. MineralMan Mar 2018 #29
My mistake PJMcK Mar 2018 #30
It continues to accelerate, too. MineralMan Mar 2018 #32
Man-Time PJMcK Mar 2018 #31
Well, the universe is billions of years old and god is only a few hundred thousand at most. nt Binkie The Clown Mar 2018 #8
Good point. MineralMan Mar 2018 #18
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Looking Backward Toward C...»Reply #36