I had never even heard of SCA before this thread but I knew about Edwina Rogers because of Ed Rogers.
Train wreck.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/entequilaesverdad/2012/05/15/i-do-not-trust-edwina-rogers-to-represent-our-interests/
Ive sat out the Edwina Rogers fiasco since the Secular Coalition of America announced theyd chosen her as their new Executive Director, waiting to see if my initial revulsion would pass. It hasnt. I read the transcript of the interview she did with Greta Christina, and the entirety of her Ask Me Anything on Reddit, hoping she could somehow allay our fears and prove shes capable of representing us effectively, despite her sordid history in Republican politics. But I didnt have high hopes. Put it this way: Ive learnt over the last decade that when one trusts Cons not to kick them in the teeth, theyd best have an excellent oral surgeon on speed dial.
Edwinas managed to meet expectations: she outright lies, she avoids the hardest questions, she babbles nonsense in reply to most of the questions she deigns respond to without bald-faced lies. She is exactly what I suspected she was when I heard some absolute morons had chosen a Republican operative neck-deep in the Bush administration, yammered on Faux News, and who has donated generously to Rick bleeding Perry, to become executive director of the Secular Coalition of America: an unmitigated disaster.
Not all atheists are liberals, and I suppose it could be a good idea to get some secular conservatives on board at times if they dont end up compromising the values held by the vast majority of us. As several people have noted, a Republican lobbyist as part (not head) of the SCA isnt such a horrible idea. And I rather think it would be nice to give the Rabid Right something to worry about from within its own ranks, so the idea of developing a coalition of secular Republicans and siccing them on the fundies actually tickles me. So no, I have no objection per se to having a Republican working with the SCA.
But surely, surely, the SCA could have chosen a better Executive Director than this Bushie. She cant reach across the aisle to elected Republicans the bunch currently in office here, there and everywhere are, overwhelmingly, theocratic freaks frantic to install god as our ruler. Theyve already demonstrated that theyll abandon their own policies if a liberal expresses approval. And I cannot dismiss the fact that she actively supports some of the worst of them.