Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: What does a religious person call somebody who believes something different? [View all]pnwmom
(110,261 posts)10. You don't sound like anyone who's ever presented at a scientific conference.
https://thesiswhisperer.com/2013/02/13/academic-assholes/
This sentence made me think about the nasty cleverness that some academics display when they comment on student work in front of their peers. Displaying cleverness during PhD seminars and during talks at conferences is a way academics show off their scholarly prowess to each other, sometimes at the expense of the student. Cleverness is a form of currency in academia; or cultural capital if you like. If other academics think you are clever they will listen to you more; you will be invited to speak at other institutions, to sit on panels and join important committees and boards. Appearing clever is a route to power and promotion. If performing like an asshole in a public forum creates the perverse impression that you are more clever than others who do not, there is a clear incentive to behave this way.
Sutton claims only a small percentage of people who act like assholes are actually sociopaths (he amusingly calls them flaming assholes) and talks about how asshole behaviour is contagious. He argues that its easy for asshole behaviour to become normalised in the workplace because, most of the time, the assholes are not called to account. So its possible that many academics are acting like assholes without even being aware of it.
How does it happen? The budding asshole has learned, perhaps subconsciously, that other people interrupt them less if they use stronger language. They get attention: more air time in panel discussions and at conferences. Other budding assholes will watch strong language being used and then imitate the behaviour. No one publicly objects to the language being used, even if the student is clearly upset, and nasty behaviour gets reinforced. As time goes on the culture progressively becomes more poisonous and gets transmitted to the students. Students who are upset by the behaviour of academic assholes are often counselled, often by their peers, that this is how things are done around here . Those who refuse to accept the culture are made to feel abnormal because, in a literal sense, they are if being normal is to be an asshole.
Not all academic cultures are badly afflicted by assholery, but many are. I dont know about you, but seen this way, some of the sicker academic cultures suddenly make much more sense. This theory might explain why senior academics are sometimes nicer and more generous to their colleagues than than those lower in the pecking order. If asshole behaviour is a route to power, those who already have positions of power in the hierarchy and are widely acknowledged to be clever, have less reason to use it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
208 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What does a religious person call somebody who believes something different? [View all]
DetlefK
Apr 2018
OP
I am an atheist and my last job before retiring was at a Salvation Army homeless shelter.
elocs
Apr 2018
#5
I am talking about the intolerance of one religion over another and vice versa.
democratisphere
Apr 2018
#64
This isn't about church, going or not going. It's about religions that have no tolerance
democratisphere
Apr 2018
#73
The essential point is there are LOTS of different views in Christianity and other religions
ollie10
Apr 2018
#9
But it is over-generalizing (and unscientific for that matter) to ignore the FACT
ollie10
Apr 2018
#22
Like that time Dawkins burned Gould at the stake over Punctuated Equilibrum?
Act_of_Reparation
Apr 2018
#182
Just this year, thousands of Many Worlds-ists were displaced from their native lands...
Act_of_Reparation
Apr 2018
#186
Welcome to DU! The 'lay of the land' here can be hilly- at times. But the bumpy
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2018
#20
Well then I suggest you berate and lecture the OP for their horrible abuse of all believers.
trotsky
Apr 2018
#62
Ya know it never seems to be any of the rude religionists getting called out, either.
trotsky
Apr 2018
#117
"I am new to Democratic Underground so I am still getting the lay of the land."
Act_of_Reparation
Apr 2018
#97
What do scientists call another scientist who thinks a different theory is correct?
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#169
And my point is that scientists can be just as vehemently certain of themselves,
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#179