Religion

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)

39. Were you looking in a mirror when you typed that?

Wed May 23, 2012, 07:52 PM

May 2012

I think the first three points accurately describe your posting style and agree that this subthread clearly demonstrates your propensity to distract and derail (that's being disruptive).

This subthread started when I asked you of your opinion of the article you posted without comment and whether its contents factor into your decision to support the RCC. You refused to answer the question and have spent the majority of your time here calling me a troll because I find amusement in the way you continually run away from even the most basic questions (like, what's your opinion on this thing you posted).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Catholic dioceses, colleges sue over Obama mandate [View all] rug May 2012 OP

What do you think about this, rug? laconicsax May 2012 #1

I'm flattered by your interest in my organizational affiliations. rug May 2012 #2

I'm not sure I recall reading your opinion on this particular news item before. laconicsax May 2012 #4

Watch this instead. rug May 2012 #5

Watched it a while ago. laconicsax May 2012 #6

Thank you for providing the classic definition of trolling. rug May 2012 #7

Says the one with the biggest boat in the fleet! cleanhippie May 2012 #8

I see you come for amusement as well. rug May 2012 #10

I'm here for the same reasons as you are, rug. cleanhippie May 2012 #11

I seriously doubt that. rug May 2012 #12

Well, let's see then. Just why ARE you here, rug? cleanhippie May 2012 #13

Not to post cartoons, deride, and post smileys rolling on the floor. rug May 2012 #14

I guess you misunderstood my question. Why ARE you here, rug? cleanhippie May 2012 #15

To discuss religion, not caricature. I guess you didn't answer mine. rug May 2012 #16

Then your "serious doubt it" meter must be broken because I'm here for the same reason as you. cleanhippie May 2012 #17

But you never DISCUSS anything. mr blur May 2012 #33

It's curious how one's peculiar views skew his perception of reality. rug May 2012 #34

So anyone who doesn't take DU that seriously is a troll? laconicsax May 2012 #18

No, this is: rug May 2012 #19

It isn't trolling to say that you amuse me. laconicsax May 2012 #20

It isn't amusing to say that you troll. rug May 2012 #23

I never said I'm here to amuse you. laconicsax May 2012 #25

No, clearly you have a different purpose. rug May 2012 #26

You seem surprised that I'm not here to amuse you. laconicsax May 2012 #29

You are the most unsurprising, obvious and transparent poster I have seen here. rug May 2012 #32

I aim for consistency, clarity, and I'm not into playing bullshit games. laconicsax May 2012 #35

No you don't. rug May 2012 #37

Were you looking in a mirror when you typed that? laconicsax May 2012 #39

This rug May 2012 #41

The funny thing is that all but one of those are replies to personal attacks made by you. laconicsax May 2012 #45

Sanity calls. See you next time. rug May 2012 #47

I realize that it's easier for you to call me crazy rather than talk about issues. n/t laconicsax May 2012 #54

This post was alerted on. Allowed to stand 5/1. ohiosmith May 2012 #36

Looks like his baiting failed this time. rug May 2012 #38

Please, rug. Do you really consider #35 to be baiting? laconicsax May 2012 #40

Do you consider #23 alertable? rug May 2012 #42

I don't know who alerted, but it was alerted on Kali May 2012 #43

Good try Kali but as you can see . . . . rug May 2012 #46

just being a mom Kali May 2012 #51

Which reminds me of another quote from Oscar. rug May 2012 #53

Not particularly. laconicsax May 2012 #44

I alerted on it Goblinmonger May 2012 #48

You alerted on #7. I wonder who alerted on #23. rug May 2012 #49

My bad. Goblinmonger May 2012 #50

I'm more concerned with how people get away with trolling. rug May 2012 #52

oh man.... oldernwiser May 2012 #3

Catholic dioceses, colleges sue over Obama mandate AlbertCat May 2012 #9

It really is interesting, isn't it? laconicsax May 2012 #21

"our fundamental rights hang in the balance,..." EvolveOrConvolve May 2012 #22

The church leaders want to have their cake and eat it, too meow2u3 May 2012 #24

It's not a tax exemption issue or a federal fnding issue. rug May 2012 #27

Stop employing people? 2ndAmForComputers May 2012 #30

So, is the aforementioned suing an initiative you approve of? 2ndAmForComputers May 2012 #28

Why would you asume that? rug May 2012 #31

I'm asking. The answer may be yes or no. 2ndAmForComputers May 2012 #55

No, it's groundless. Now, why do you ask? rug May 2012 #56