Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Stop playing word-games already. Atheists "believing" is not the same as theists "believing". [View all]
"I believe in the existence of God."Translation: Regardless of evidence or lack of evidence, I make an assumption. And if I see evidence to the contrary, I will not change my assumption.
"I believe it will rain today."
Translation: There is evidence for or against this claim, but I don't have it, which is why I make an assumption. And if I see evidence to the contrary, I will change my assumption.
You see? Same word, two meanings.
So please stop with that humbug that an atheist not "believing" in God is the same as a theist "believing" in God.
An atheist does not believe in God because he demands evidence and doesn't receive it.
A theist's belief in God is not impacted by evidence of any kind whatsoever.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stop playing word-games already. Atheists "believing" is not the same as theists "believing". [View all]
DetlefK
Jun 2018
OP
Not, it's not. Because the word has two meanings with two exclusionary premises.
DetlefK
Jun 2018
#8
Identical reasoning to those who equate the "theory" of creationism with evolution theory
Major Nikon
Jun 2018
#22
And each type, in the absence of proof, believes that their position is correct. eom
guillaumeb
Jun 2018
#16
My fat thumbs were accidently divinely guided to the emos on my phone keyboard
marylandblue
Jun 2018
#56