Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Stop playing word-games already. Atheists "believing" is not the same as theists "believing". [View all]marylandblue
(12,344 posts)12. Why is neither belief provable?
Last edited Wed Jun 20, 2018, 11:28 AM - Edit history (1)
Being convinced that "faith" doesn't require evidence and therefore any subject of faith is beyond proof, is itself an article faith, but also could be subject to proofs. The believer's rejection of such proof does not invalidate the proof.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Stop playing word-games already. Atheists "believing" is not the same as theists "believing". [View all]
DetlefK
Jun 2018
OP
Not, it's not. Because the word has two meanings with two exclusionary premises.
DetlefK
Jun 2018
#8
Identical reasoning to those who equate the "theory" of creationism with evolution theory
Major Nikon
Jun 2018
#22
And each type, in the absence of proof, believes that their position is correct. eom
guillaumeb
Jun 2018
#16
My fat thumbs were accidently divinely guided to the emos on my phone keyboard
marylandblue
Jun 2018
#56