Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,925 posts)
39. Assumes he was ever on the rails
Wed Jun 20, 2018, 09:25 PM
Jun 2018

Once he adopted the position that all atheists have a belief system, he can’t go back without looking foolish, so instead of remaining silent in his error he doubles down on the foolishness and removes all doubt.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes. Croney Jun 2018 #1
But equivocation is one of the apologist's most powerful rhetorical weapons. trotsky Jun 2018 #2
All apologetics rely on word games of some sort. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2018 #3
Or, more accurately: "Will it go 'round in circles?" MineralMan Jun 2018 #4
I'd argue this one is worse, though. Pope George Ringo II Jun 2018 #23
I am sure someone will find a quote somewhere edhopper Jun 2018 #5
It's a favorite straw man among the least honest believers. Pope George Ringo II Jun 2018 #6
What does believe mean? guillaumeb Jun 2018 #7
Not, it's not. Because the word has two meanings with two exclusionary premises. DetlefK Jun 2018 #8
Neither belief is provable. guillaumeb Jun 2018 #9
Why is neither belief provable? marylandblue Jun 2018 #12
Faith exists. guillaumeb Jun 2018 #14
Your opinion. marylandblue Jun 2018 #15
Of course. guillaumeb Jun 2018 #18
No one disputes that faith exists. marylandblue Jun 2018 #19
So you are saying god is non-existant? Lordquinton Jun 2018 #45
What a misunderstanding on your part. eom guillaumeb Jun 2018 #48
Oh, I misunderstood you? Lordquinton Jun 2018 #52
What I said: guillaumeb Jun 2018 #58
Are you misunderstanding me on purpose? DetlefK Jun 2018 #20
That poster is performing for an audience. Mariana Jun 2018 #24
And what audience are you playing for? eom guillaumeb Jun 2018 #49
The one that only exists in your imagination. nt. Mariana Jun 2018 #50
So insightful. guillaumeb Jun 2018 #51
Thanks! nt. Mariana Jun 2018 #53
Identical reasoning to those who equate the "theory" of creationism with evolution theory Major Nikon Jun 2018 #22
Know why it's a sticky wicket attempting to talk to you guys? sprinkleeninow Jun 2018 #25
Gee, thanks for that Major Nikon Jun 2018 #27
I do believe you're welcome. sprinkleeninow Jun 2018 #30
You veered off topic. guillaumeb Jun 2018 #36
False Major Nikon Jun 2018 #38
You can't prove that. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2018 #44
They are two different types of atheists, both don't believe it deities marylandblue Jun 2018 #10
One has a certain belief. guillaumeb Jun 2018 #11
So? They are different types of atheist marylandblue Jun 2018 #13
And each type, in the absence of proof, believes that their position is correct. eom guillaumeb Jun 2018 #16
Is there a type of person who believes they hold incorrect beliefs? marylandblue Jun 2018 #17
😘 sprinkleeninow Jun 2018 #26
:pals: marylandblue Jun 2018 #28
I believe.... sprinkleeninow Jun 2018 #29
So your emojicons are a real miracle! Can you do more? marylandblue Jun 2018 #31
They only manifest when I'm a behaving chick 🐤 or sprinkleeninow Jun 2018 #32
🤗😉I've performed a miracle! I am applying for sainthood.😇 marylandblue Jun 2018 #47
"A day late and a dollar short" is what I seem to be. sprinkleeninow Jun 2018 #55
My fat thumbs were accidently divinely guided to the emos on my phone keyboard marylandblue Jun 2018 #56
Not aware of your thumbs? 😊 sprinkleeninow Jun 2018 #57
You on my list, you lovey-duvvers. 😉 Buds! sprinkleeninow Jun 2018 #33
The difference is that they care about proof. Theistic believers do not. DetlefK Jun 2018 #21
No, they care about what they see as proof. guillaumeb Jun 2018 #37
Are you trying to redefine "proof"? What definition are you using? DetlefK Jun 2018 #40
You went right off the rails there. Voltaire2 Jun 2018 #34
Assumes he was ever on the rails Major Nikon Jun 2018 #39
explain to me qazplm135 Jun 2018 #59
One who says that there are no deities guillaumeb Jun 2018 #60
not remotely an answer to the question I asked qazplm135 Jun 2018 #61
At least you got a non-sequitur instead of a canned response Major Nikon Jun 2018 #62
There is no positive evidence that deities do not exist. DetlefK Jun 2018 #42
Don't ask me, I am not a hard atheist. marylandblue Jun 2018 #43
It's the same point. Igel Jun 2018 #35
That makes religious belief meaningless and pointless. DetlefK Jun 2018 #41
Is this your brother-in-law? trotsky Jun 2018 #46
I've said this before and pissed off a theist arguing like this TlalocW Jun 2018 #54
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Stop playing word-games a...»Reply #39