Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Thats my opinion

(2,001 posts)
Wed May 30, 2012, 12:55 PM May 2012

Check out the motivation! [View all]

“RELGION, ETHICS AND SOCIAL PRACTICE”—AND 20 AMAZING COLLEGE STUDENTS
This past semester my wife and I were enrolled in Religion, Ethics and Social Practice, a class composed of 20 undergraduates and 10 elders. This academic offering was part of the curriculum offered by the college’s Department of Religious Studies. While we sign up for a class each term, this intergenerational experience was different. I had never before encountered a group of 20 year olds as turned on to what their faith had inspired them to do in the community or the wider world, as were these bright men and women. Each undergraduate designed a project she/he was prepared to execute. Here is a sampling: Teach women’s soccer in the slums of Nairobi as a way to encourage self-respect. Work with women ex-convicts who make jams and jellies for sale in local stores. Work for a Constitutional Amendment overturning the “Citizens United” Supreme Court decision. Mentor minority youth, by teaching them the meditative skills which might help them prepare for college. Assist kids on drugs by providing them the testimony of ex drug addicts/

One of the proposals that got my attention was nothing quite so grand. A nearby city, here unnamed, had passed an ordinance which provided guards and locks for the toilets at the public library. No one is permitted to use them unless thev have a valid library card. Who does this bar? Why the homeless, who have no address, and therefore cannot obtain a card. And that restriction defines the purpose of the ordinance. If the homeless have nowhere to do you know what, maybe they will gravitate to some other city where they can.

This student, and those who will work with her, will do the hard political work necessary to reverse the ordinance. This will involve, among other things, discovering who promoted the ban in the first place, who are the others in the community who want to reverse it, and what necessary steps need to be taken.

Saul Alinsky, the nation’s best-known community organizer, faced a similar issue at a municipal airport, so he organized a “sit in” by which his group controlled every toilet in the terminal! It didn’t take long until the terminal’s operators realized they had a losing battle on their hands, and Alinsky got the changes he wanted. Rational discourse is one way to institute change. Guerilla theater is another.

At the same time, a spin-off of a local Occupy has secured a grant to find ways to provide the homeless with the personal identification needed to get a library card, a Social Security card, a driver’s license, voter registration, a post-office box and other documents necessary to re-enter society. Street people often have none of these things. These twin projects plan to work together. If the homeless in this community can get a card, then the toilets at the library will be free for the sitting!

But back to the class. From time to time I get disheartened by what is going on in America. Few things have more soured my appreciation of our nation than the rise of the Tea Party. Its inherent racism, selfishness, bitterness and support of inequality caused me for a while to wonder just where we were headed. And then I ran across this group of students, most of them coming from affluent families, who. had a vision of some noble possibility for their lives. While most of these young adults have a religious motivation which impels them on their journeys, there are others all across the country who have come to some nobler way to live through other motivations. Maybe there is yet hope for the re-flowering of America’s more gracious spirit. At least the students in this class have provided me with fresh hope.




42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Check out the motivation! [View all] Thats my opinion May 2012 OP
Motivations designed and distributed by rrneck May 2012 #1
What is the constitutional prohibition against political activity? cbayer May 2012 #2
The First Amendment. rrneck May 2012 #3
I disagree that the First Amendment prohibits religious groups from engaging in political action cbayer May 2012 #4
How so? rrneck May 2012 #5
The establishment claause constrains the government, not churches. eomer May 2012 #27
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." rrneck May 2012 #32
You forgot to include the free exercise clause. Thats my opinion May 2012 #35
How do you feel about rrneck May 2012 #38
I feel i should add... rrneck May 2012 #6
1+++ patrice May 2012 #8
Appreciate your responses here and I see your point about the difficulty cbayer May 2012 #9
Forgive the intrusion --> daaron May 2012 #12
Well said. Again, I think, but am not certain, that the projects of these students cbayer May 2012 #13
Could you explain how the Establishment clause bans organized polticking of religious institutions. Leontius May 2012 #15
By "organized politicking" I'm referring to endorsing or opposing political candidates --> daaron May 2012 #22
What I want you to explain is how you reach the conclusion that Leontius May 2012 #23
Campaigning from the pulpit is banned according to SCOTUS decisions. daaron May 2012 #24
The law that constrains churches is the Internal Revenue Code, not the establishment clause. eomer May 2012 #28
The tax code that constrains churches stands only because SCOTUS --> daaron May 2012 #30
The problem is when you start playing so fast and loose with the Constitution Leontius May 2012 #42
Here is some --> daaron May 2012 #31
The question decided in that Supreme Court ruling is whether the government is permitted... eomer May 2012 #33
6 of one, 1/2 dozen of the other. daaron May 2012 #39
No, I didn't say the government doesn't limit churches, I said the Constitution doesn't. eomer May 2012 #40
Sudo !! daaron May 2012 #41
Yes, that is what the First Amendment is all about. nt Thats my opinion May 2012 #18
Sorry, nope. rrneck May 2012 #14
Take a look at #16. Thats my opinion May 2012 #19
Hey, rrneck May 2012 #21
Help me understand. Thats my opinion May 2012 #16
No society can last for long rrneck May 2012 #20
Hee hee -- "...in air conditioning and iced Scotch..." daaron May 2012 #25
To the extent that political action or causes are more than 50% associated with a certain candidate, patrice May 2012 #7
None of these projects appear to be supporting particular candidates. cbayer May 2012 #10
"While most of these young adults have a religious motivation which impels them on their journeys" trotsky May 2012 #11
Other than using your response as just another way to take a swipe at anything religious, Thats my opinion May 2012 #17
Nope, your attempt to smear me is misguided. trotsky May 2012 #26
If Thats my opinion May 2012 #36
Actually, it's honest commentary. trotsky May 2012 #37
Religious groups often engage in things that benefit society. MineralMan May 2012 #29
Sounds like a wonderful program. cbayer May 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Check out the motivation!»Reply #0