Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Check out the motivation! [View all]Thats my opinion
(2,001 posts)16. Help me understand.
I'm at a loss to understand what you are complaining about in this post. What is the violation and who are the violators? We have often commented on the two diverse clauses in the First Amendment.
If kindness and compassion have nothing to do with public life, then we are in worse shape than I have even imagined. If these twin attributes of the good society are in themselves a violation of the First Amendment, then we are reading different Constitutions. Please specify.
What are the sub-contractors you mention? No church or any religious organization was part of this class.
And who is it that produces ideology for profit, and where do they appear in this post?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I disagree that the First Amendment prohibits religious groups from engaging in political action
cbayer
May 2012
#4
Well said. Again, I think, but am not certain, that the projects of these students
cbayer
May 2012
#13
Could you explain how the Establishment clause bans organized polticking of religious institutions.
Leontius
May 2012
#15
By "organized politicking" I'm referring to endorsing or opposing political candidates -->
daaron
May 2012
#22
The law that constrains churches is the Internal Revenue Code, not the establishment clause.
eomer
May 2012
#28
The question decided in that Supreme Court ruling is whether the government is permitted...
eomer
May 2012
#33
No, I didn't say the government doesn't limit churches, I said the Constitution doesn't.
eomer
May 2012
#40
To the extent that political action or causes are more than 50% associated with a certain candidate,
patrice
May 2012
#7
"While most of these young adults have a religious motivation which impels them on their journeys"
trotsky
May 2012
#11
Other than using your response as just another way to take a swipe at anything religious,
Thats my opinion
May 2012
#17