Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Check out the motivation! [View all]daaron
(763 posts)31. Here is some -->
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/04.html
Looks like the tax code was set up to apply to all non-profits including religious bodies in order to apply a secular standard. That is, to give the exemption only to religions would violate the Establishment clause, so we don't do that. The entanglement doctrine applies here, too.
Looks like the tax code was set up to apply to all non-profits including religious bodies in order to apply a secular standard. That is, to give the exemption only to religions would violate the Establishment clause, so we don't do that. The entanglement doctrine applies here, too.
...termination of exemptions would deeply involve government in the internal affairs of religious bodies, because evaluation of religious properties for tax purposes would be required and there would be tax liens and foreclosures and litigation concerning such matters. 135
While the general issue is now settled, it is to be expected that variations of the exemption upheld in Walz will present the Court with an opportunity to elaborate the field still further. 136 For example, the Court determined that a sales tax exemption applicable only to religious publications constituted a violation of the Establishment Clause, 137 and, on the other hand, that application of a general sales and use tax provision to religious publications violates neither the Establishment Clause nor the Free Exercise Clause. 138
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I disagree that the First Amendment prohibits religious groups from engaging in political action
cbayer
May 2012
#4
Well said. Again, I think, but am not certain, that the projects of these students
cbayer
May 2012
#13
Could you explain how the Establishment clause bans organized polticking of religious institutions.
Leontius
May 2012
#15
By "organized politicking" I'm referring to endorsing or opposing political candidates -->
daaron
May 2012
#22
The law that constrains churches is the Internal Revenue Code, not the establishment clause.
eomer
May 2012
#28
The question decided in that Supreme Court ruling is whether the government is permitted...
eomer
May 2012
#33
No, I didn't say the government doesn't limit churches, I said the Constitution doesn't.
eomer
May 2012
#40
To the extent that political action or causes are more than 50% associated with a certain candidate,
patrice
May 2012
#7
"While most of these young adults have a religious motivation which impels them on their journeys"
trotsky
May 2012
#11
Other than using your response as just another way to take a swipe at anything religious,
Thats my opinion
May 2012
#17