Religion

Rob H.

(5,872 posts)

17. *sigh* (minor nitpick)

Mon Jun 4, 2012, 10:08 AM

Jun 2012

It's Madalyn Murray O'Hair, not Madeline Murray O’Hare. If she's going to be brought up as an example, the very least the author could do is spell her name correctly.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No Religion? 7 Types of Non-Believers [View all] rug Jun 2012 OP

Religion seeks to build walls, literally, between people and spirituality. KurtNYC Jun 2012 #1

There are always walls. We need doors. rug Jun 2012 #2

And people are using those doors to leave the churches. cleanhippie Jun 2012 #8

It's a revolving door. rug Jun 2012 #10

Churches are filled up with the uneducated and the desperate poor every day. Walk away Jun 2012 #12

I hope all the churches are filled with the uneducated and the poor. rug Jun 2012 #13

Well that won't keep your Pope in red shoes and lavish frocks nt mr blur Jun 2012 #21

Happy Jubilee to you mr blur! rug Jun 2012 #35

I hope all the churches are filled with the uneducated and the poor. AlbertCat Jun 2012 #22

Don't worry the public schools of the US are filled with the poor and uneducated. Leontius Jun 2012 #25

If you don't put a wall around "God" then you can't charge admission KurtNYC Jun 2012 #16

Why on Earth would I need a label? djean111 Jun 2012 #3

+1 get the red out Jun 2012 #4

Probably the same reason people make these. rug Jun 2012 #5

"Anti-theism challenges the legitimacy of faith as a moral authority or way of knowing." trotsky Jun 2012 #6

I'll send you a matching t-shirt. rug Jun 2012 #7

Hey trotsky! That's twice in a week I agree with you. Starboard Tack Jun 2012 #26

Considering you've just self-identified as an "anti-theist"... trotsky Jun 2012 #31

What are you talking about? Were you being insincere? Starboard Tack Jun 2012 #32

Here, take one of these. It should help. trotsky Jun 2012 #33

Are you also anti-human, because they happen to be. Starboard Tack Jun 2012 #34

That's your straw man. trotsky Jun 2012 #36

Sorry about that. My bad. I edited it. Starboard Tack Jun 2012 #37

It's still a straw man. trotsky Jun 2012 #38

I said it, but it's what you advocate. Right? Starboard Tack Jun 2012 #39

No, you made it up and assigned that stance to me. AKA a straw man. trotsky Jun 2012 #40

I'm so sorry. Must have mistaken you for someone else. Starboard Tack Jun 2012 #41

Your apology is accepted. trotsky Jun 2012 #43

Thank you for your gracious acceptance of my apology Starboard Tack Jun 2012 #47

This reminds me of an old Emo Philips joke - djean111 Jun 2012 #9

That's a funny joke. rug Jun 2012 #11

Found in the comments section of this article: daaron Jun 2012 #14

I much prefer this to those who feel that there are two sides and two sides only, cbayer Jun 2012 #15

*sigh* (minor nitpick) Rob H. Jun 2012 #17

Well, what a load of cack intaglio Jun 2012 #18

There are many kinds of golfer, and nigh-unlimited non-golfer types dmallind Jun 2012 #19

Do you get to choose more than one? nt. SwissTony Jun 2012 #20

Word salad. AlbertCat Jun 2012 #23

Freethinker Pantheist AndyTiedye Jun 2012 #24

Pantheists aren't "nonbelievers", they believe in God with a capital "G". bananas Jun 2012 #27

At least one they forgot ... GeorgeGist Jun 2012 #28

Has science taken a position on the existence or nonexistence of god(s)? rug Jun 2012 #29

In a sense, yes. laconicsax Jun 2012 #42

That wasn't the question. rug Jun 2012 #44

"Has science taken a position on the existence or nonexistence of god(s)?" laconicsax Jun 2012 #45

The actual answer, not "in a sense", is no. rug Jun 2012 #46

Would you care to name the scientific theory that requires a god? laconicsax Jun 2012 #48

As soon as you name a scientific theory that concrns itself with a god. rug Jun 2012 #49

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! laconicsax Jun 2012 #50

Sure it is. Why you even used three exclamation points. rug Jun 2012 #51

Either the operating system of the world had an author (or authors), or it didn't eridani Jun 2012 #52

If that is the case, it'd best establish its hypothesis and design an experiment to test it. rug Jun 2012 #53

I thought I said that eridani Jun 2012 #54

Thoughts are real Angry Dragon Jun 2012 #30