Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

darkstar3

(8,763 posts)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 07:34 PM Jun 2012

"Inspired by God." [View all]

WICHITA, Kan. (AP) — A Kansas abortion opponent accused of sending a threatening letter to a Wichita doctor claims in court documents that her message was "divinely inspired" and protected by the freedoms of speech and religion.

...snip...

The lawsuit, filed by the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, seeks a court order that keeps Dillard from contacting Means or coming within 250 feet of Means, her home, car or business. It also seeks damages of $5,000 to Means and a civil penalty of $15,000.

Dillard responded with a lawsuit saying the government's suit violates her freedom of speech and religion. Government lawyers have criticized her arguments and asked the court to dismiss her counterclaim. Her attorney asked the court Friday allow her to amend her lawsuit to address "any pleading defects" and support its allegations.

"Angel Dillard believed she was inspired by God to send a letter to Dr. Means in an attempt to convince her not to pursue her plan to abort babies in Wichita," attorney Donald McKinney said. "Angel Dillard wrote the letter quickly, in a matter of minutes, and believed that her message was divinely inspired."

Taken from: http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/article/Abortion-opponent-says-letter-divinely-inspired-3608456.php

Be sure to read her opinion on Scott Roeder at the end. Then come on back and leave a comment. There's quite a bit in this little story, and here are just a few issues:

1. Her strongly held religious beliefs.
2. The "religious freedom" defense.
3. Her admiration of a murderer.
4. The fact that this is just one in a deluge of stories regarding violence by Christians against those who don't share their beliefs.
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Inspired by God." [View all] darkstar3 Jun 2012 OP
"Inspired by God" = disingenuous babble that means nothing. nt ladjf Jun 2012 #1
The woman at the center of this lawsuit who has been harassing an abortion doctor clearly disagrees. darkstar3 Jun 2012 #2
If there is a god JNelson6563 Jun 2012 #3
Are you saying that all people that follow a god are dangerous and deranged? cbayer Jun 2012 #4
Let's just say JNelson6563 Jun 2012 #16
You didn't really answer my question, did you? cbayer Jun 2012 #21
No, of course not all. JNelson6563 Jun 2012 #35
That right there is part of the problem. darkstar3 Jun 2012 #19
You should read Judge Martin's decision denying her motion to dismiss last December. rug Jun 2012 #5
Current events are more interesting, just by virtue of being current and capable of affecting lives. darkstar3 Jun 2012 #8
If you'd read the decision, this claim is precisely what was invited by the decision. rug Jun 2012 #9
You assume I didn't read it. I simply don't care to discuss it. darkstar3 Jun 2012 #11
Oh, it's far more than an assumption. rug Jun 2012 #12
You didn't answer any of my questions. darkstar3 Jun 2012 #14
You didn't read the decision that led up to this claim. That's not a insult. rug Jun 2012 #15
Your assumptions and dancing aren't worth the time you put into them. darkstar3 Jun 2012 #17
Uh huh. rug Jun 2012 #18
Trying to derail already? laconicsax Jun 2012 #20
It may shock you but discussing a ruling that gives rise to another claim is discussion. rug Jun 2012 #22
I'm not seeing you post that decision or discuss it (or the OP for that matter). laconicsax Jun 2012 #24
That's right, it's not my OP rug Jun 2012 #26
Glad you admit that you weren't discussing the OP. laconicsax Jun 2012 #31
You said that, I didn't. rug Jun 2012 #32
What a splendid lie! laconicsax Jun 2012 #33
Ok, type the first three words of the decision. rug Jun 2012 #34
Do you mean the Memorandum and Order issued by Judge Marten? laconicsax Jun 2012 #36
The best way to win a bet is to wager on that action from him against a newbie or a fool. darkstar3 Jun 2012 #23
I won $20 wagering on his actions not too long ago. n/t laconicsax Jun 2012 #25
I won a Grand Am that way not too long ago. rug Jun 2012 #28
Congratulations on your shit car. n/t laconicsax Jun 2012 #30
The funny thing is, if I had bet on this thread, it would have been NTS in < 10. darkstar3 Jun 2012 #29
Which action is that and which of them is you? rug Jun 2012 #27
Do you have a link to that decision? Jim__ Jun 2012 #38
Here you go. rug Jun 2012 #39
Thanks. - n/t. Jim__ Jun 2012 #40
I was glad to see the judge ruled that whether or not it was a true threat was a matter for a jury. Jim__ Jun 2012 #42
I agree. I think that's why she's doubling down on the First Amendment claim. rug Jun 2012 #43
Inspired by what a life of being told by humans what "God is and isn't", being 2on2u Jun 2012 #6
Can you try that title again? rug Jun 2012 #7
I don't know. n/t 2on2u Jun 2012 #10
Lol, ok. rug Jun 2012 #13
Brokers alaways confuse... swapnilsharma110 Jun 2012 #37
Par for the course dmallind Jun 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»"Inspired by God.&qu...»Reply #0