Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

cbayer

(146,218 posts)

6. I disagree with the court and think it should be removed.

Reply to rug (Original post)

Mon Jun 11, 2012, 12:45 PM

Jun 2012

There are parents that feel very strongly about this and I think it's their right to not have their children recite something that they don't believe and are even actively opposed to.

My connection is too slow to get the decision to open, but I am wondering on what basis the court ruled against this.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Humanists Will Appeal "under God" Ruling [View all] rug Jun 2012 OP

Silly waste of time, imo, elleng Jun 2012 #1

Yeah, there's a tight Senatorial race in Massachusetts. rug Jun 2012 #2

Best not to piss off the Christian bigots. trotsky Jun 2012 #3

Gotta be practical, whether we like it or not. elleng Jun 2012 #4

Guess what all new incursions into church-state melding say? trotsky Jun 2012 #5

Those 'incursions' are mistaken, wrong factually, elleng Jun 2012 #15

Yet that's what they use. trotsky Jun 2012 #16

Shouldn't do what's right for fear of ill will? Ninjaneer Jun 2012 #18

I disagree with the court and think it should be removed. cbayer Jun 2012 #6

The gist of it is that the recitation is voluntary, it is not a prayer rug Jun 2012 #8

Voluntary with a grade school child, with all the attendant peer pressure, cbayer Jun 2012 #9

There is that. rug Jun 2012 #10

Not forbidden, imo, but should be voluntary to the extent possible. cbayer Jun 2012 #11

I agree entirely with your position in this thread longship Jun 2012 #13

I stopped saying the pledge in the late sixties or early seventies struggle4progress Jun 2012 #7

Yah, I just stick "indivisible" back in. daaron Jun 2012 #17

I grew up reciting the pledge in school OriginalGeek Jun 2012 #12

Jesus...they should just stop reciting that creepy ass pledge altogether. Evoman Jun 2012 #14