Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

(49,533 posts)

16. Yet that's what they use.

Tue Jun 12, 2012, 06:54 AM

Jun 2012

You can call others foolish for pursuing state-church separation. I'm not going to.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Humanists Will Appeal "under God" Ruling [View all] rug Jun 2012 OP

Silly waste of time, imo, elleng Jun 2012 #1

Yeah, there's a tight Senatorial race in Massachusetts. rug Jun 2012 #2

Best not to piss off the Christian bigots. trotsky Jun 2012 #3

Gotta be practical, whether we like it or not. elleng Jun 2012 #4

Guess what all new incursions into church-state melding say? trotsky Jun 2012 #5

Those 'incursions' are mistaken, wrong factually, elleng Jun 2012 #15

Yet that's what they use. trotsky Jun 2012 #16

Shouldn't do what's right for fear of ill will? Ninjaneer Jun 2012 #18

I disagree with the court and think it should be removed. cbayer Jun 2012 #6

There is that. rug Jun 2012 #10

Not forbidden, imo, but should be voluntary to the extent possible. cbayer Jun 2012 #11

I agree entirely with your position in this thread longship Jun 2012 #13

I stopped saying the pledge in the late sixties or early seventies struggle4progress Jun 2012 #7

Yah, I just stick "indivisible" back in. daaron Jun 2012 #17

I grew up reciting the pledge in school OriginalGeek Jun 2012 #12