Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
2. Encouraging, but there is still a danger
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 02:33 PM
Jun 2012

The "Christian Country" claimers have an interpretation of the First Amendment that is counter to every interpretation from when it was debated in that early congress to the current day. The interpretation the right wing prefers is that one religion cannot be preferred over another but that religion itself can be preferred over non-religion.

You can see this argument behind all of these religious freedom bills at the state level. To then, the Lemon test goes out the door and a law may benefit religion as long as it doesn't benefit a specific one. Of course, this argument fails even their loose interpretations by the facts that these bills are so draconian that it is clear that they favor only the strictest and fundementalist sects over the liberal ones.

I worry for us if Rmoney gets into power and we lose one or two SCOTUS judges due to retirement. If the Supremes adopt the right wing interpretation, good-bye First Amendment religious freedoms as we know them.

To us atheists, this is a very scary and real danger.

Thanks for posting this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That number would go up if there were a good atheist candidate as well Bjorn Against Jun 2012 #1
Encouraging, but there is still a danger longship Jun 2012 #2
Good news. nt ZombieHorde Jun 2012 #3
You'd need a minimum of 70% among Democrats and Independents muriel_volestrangler Jun 2012 #4
I think it's the trend that is most notable. cbayer Jun 2012 #5
I credit the "Gnu Atheists" (especially the Out Campaign) putting us in the radar for that. 2ndAmForComputers Jun 2012 #10
There is also some recent data that the voting population cares less cbayer Jun 2012 #11
I'll happily take Romney becoming viable if that means Atheists becoming viable too. 2ndAmForComputers Jun 2012 #12
There is no circumstance under which I would happily take a viable Romney. rug Jun 2012 #13
If not him, it would be another, Protestant Republican, who would be just as much of a threat. 2ndAmForComputers Jun 2012 #14
Let me rephrase: there is no circumstance under which I would happily take a viable republican. rug Jun 2012 #16
Interestingly, the data leading to this article indicates that Mormons have made the least progress cbayer Jun 2012 #15
Just what I was waiting to hear. rrneck Jun 2012 #6
As an atheist gun owner progressive, you'd get my vote! :D (nt) eqfan592 Jun 2012 #8
Yeah, a snowball's chance --> daaron Jun 2012 #7
Sure ...and ALL they have to do is persuade 92.8% of those who "might" vote for them to do so dmallind Jun 2012 #9
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Atheists have chance of b...»Reply #2