Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Religion hinders progress. JNelson6563 Jul 2012 #1
Sheesh, are you dredging this crap up AGAIN? skepticscott Jul 2012 #2
Thanks for sharing, cbayer! Couldn't agree more. E_Pluribus_Unitarian Jul 2012 #3
That's what happens when some see it as a team sport involving winning and losing. cbayer Jul 2012 #5
And does the author also skepticscott Jul 2012 #12
Progressives need inclusiveness get the red out Jul 2012 #4
We (progressive, liberal Democrats) need all the help and alliances we can get. cbayer Jul 2012 #6
Is there anything about that skepticscott Jul 2012 #7
The question was "What does religion offer that progressives need to make our movement work?" get the red out Jul 2012 #8
So again you have no response skepticscott Jul 2012 #11
The community building aspects of religion can be both a strength and a weakness in a ... Jim__ Jul 2012 #9
I don't think progressive religions do overcome the tendency towards tribal conflicts. cbayer Jul 2012 #10
Not all progressives are going to fall under the same religious umbrella. Jim__ Jul 2012 #13
I am torn on this point. cbayer Jul 2012 #14
And yet you and others skepticscott Jul 2012 #15
Everybody has a place at the table. That's the only way to achieve anything meaningful. humblebum Jul 2012 #19
And if I were advocating that skepticscott Jul 2012 #20
Your preoccupation with religion or anti-religion as the case may be indicates otherwise. nt humblebum Jul 2012 #21
As I said skepticscott Jul 2012 #25
I would expect nothing else. nt humblebum Jul 2012 #29
We are between a rock and a hard place. Jim__ Jul 2012 #17
In the kind of community I live in, there are people of all conceivable cbayer Jul 2012 #18
So let me get this straight (though I kinow you won't respond) Goblinmonger Jul 2012 #16
Prayer saltwn Jul 2012 #22
It appears to work because skepticscott Jul 2012 #24
I wish I could rec a post! Shadowflash Jul 2012 #26
+1, n/t RKP5637 Jul 2012 #40
pure silliness Skittles Jul 2012 #52
Prayer:The belief that the physical laws of the universe be changed in behalf of a single petitioner hobbit709 Jul 2012 #63
I have one question: Who gets to decide what "progressive religion" is? trotsky Jul 2012 #23
The thing about Christianity saltwn Jul 2012 #28
Ummm... trotsky Jul 2012 #46
So, is Jim Wallis allowed to oppose marriage equality? saltwn Jul 2012 #65
You're kind of jumping all over the place, let me pick a few points to focus on. trotsky Jul 2012 #67
Good points saltwn Jul 2012 #93
Responses trotsky Jul 2012 #106
Welcome to DU and to the Religion group, saltwn. cbayer Jul 2012 #79
It still requires belief in something nonexistent. Deep13 Jul 2012 #27
+1, n/t RKP5637 Jul 2012 #41
I have posted on this very topic before. longship Jul 2012 #30
Great post, longship. A few questions. cbayer Jul 2012 #31
Damned Good Questions! longship Jul 2012 #38
This actually sounds like a book I would enjoy, as I have long viewed religion as part cbayer Jul 2012 #39
After the election, we'll still be friends. longship Jul 2012 #49
So is it useful skepticscott Jul 2012 #32
Hi, Skepticscott. longship Jul 2012 #34
I never said that those things came from you, now did I? skepticscott Jul 2012 #35
To be honest longship Jul 2012 #45
Well, if you're really interested in showing respect skepticscott Jul 2012 #55
I wholeheartedly disagree with both of your questions. longship Jul 2012 #89
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #82
Btw, congrats skepticscott Jul 2012 #33
Can I ask you a question? trotsky Jul 2012 #48
It's kind of an iconic objection. longship Jul 2012 #50
So no atheist has said it, yet we have to falsify it? trotsky Jul 2012 #53
Never said an atheist said it; I said atheist hear it. longship Jul 2012 #54
Atheists hear what? trotsky Jul 2012 #56
Sorry, our dialog's been sidetracked here. longship Jul 2012 #61
OK, so there's still the glaring problem of reciprocity. trotsky Jul 2012 #68
I just try to do the best I can longship Jul 2012 #75
Your post that started this subthread had the feel of a lecture to atheists. trotsky Jul 2012 #76
I do not claim to have all the answers, nor have I ever done so longship Jul 2012 #88
"We can disagree without being vitriolic." trotsky Jul 2012 #92
Buh-bye longship Jul 2012 #94
ha. So fun.... Evoman Jul 2012 #102
I agree with you. trotsky Jul 2012 #105
Very well said. eqfan592 Jul 2012 #113
+100. I agree with every word. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #117
There's actually a test case we can watch. We have China without, India with: dimbear Jul 2012 #36
I wouldn't say China has no religion, cbayer Jul 2012 #37
Right. I should have said mostly with, mostly without. dimbear Jul 2012 #42
It may outperform, but what about social change, particularly as it applies to civil rights cbayer Jul 2012 #43
China is certainly subject to some horrid abuses, but their policies are effective. dimbear Jul 2012 #44
You could be right and we shall see. cbayer Jul 2012 #47
I agree that there is a place for religious people among progressives. David__77 Jul 2012 #51
Sure there is, but that's not the point of the OP skepticscott Jul 2012 #58
No, religion is not required. David__77 Jul 2012 #86
Then it sounds like skepticscott Jul 2012 #87
I suppose. David__77 Jul 2012 #101
The Dalai Lama suggests it's time to BlueToTheBone Jul 2012 #57
I don't buy it. rrneck Jul 2012 #59
"Here's your competition. Good luck champ." Yep Goblinmonger Jul 2012 #60
LOL! Awesome post! eqfan592 Jul 2012 #62
Don't shade your eyes, plagiarize. .. rrneck Jul 2012 #64
Awesome. n/t trotsky Jul 2012 #70
The Occupy Movement Got Me Thinking About the Civil Rights Movement On the Road Jul 2012 #66
Secularism is written into our Constitution. Deep13 Jul 2012 #69
OK, So Observing that Martin Luther King's Faith Was Critical to the Civil Rights Movement On the Road Jul 2012 #71
But was King's faith critical? trotsky Jul 2012 #73
Was King's Faith Critical? On the Road Jul 2012 #90
Just attacking your logic from both sides to show your contradiction. trotsky Jul 2012 #91
I Think the Post Went Right Over Your Head On the Road Jul 2012 #98
No, I'm pretty sure it's you who is missing the point. trotsky Jul 2012 #104
Sorry, I assumed you knew the current state of the argument. Deep13 Jul 2012 #74
"There is nothing in Christian dogma that contradicts segregation" - plainly false humblebum Jul 2012 #78
"You cannot give credit to religion for something good unless you also acknowledge all the harm..." humblebum Jul 2012 #80
Secularism has NEVER done harm! State atheism, on the other hand, has. LeftishBrit Jul 2012 #108
Humblebum doesn't recognize a difference between certain brands of state atheism... eqfan592 Jul 2012 #114
So do you prefer Ford, Chevy, or Volvo? nt humblebum Jul 2012 #116
The OP Asked "What Religion Offers That Progressives Need to Make Our Movement Work" On the Road Jul 2012 #95
To say that secularism, as you define it, is written into the Constitution is debatable, and humblebum Jul 2012 #77
Do you actually mean that people should only have the choice between different religions, and not LeftishBrit Jul 2012 #107
Never said that and never implied that. nt humblebum Jul 2012 #111
There is an active religious movement within the OWS. cbayer Jul 2012 #81
So I have heard... Deep13 Jul 2012 #83
Whatever floats your boat, as long as it does not impinge on or harm others. cbayer Jul 2012 #84
Well, I do not posess the power to infringe on others or to harm them... Deep13 Jul 2012 #112
Well, I'm Glad You See Things That Way On the Road Jul 2012 #96
I don't think you can judge DU's position on religion from the religion group. cbayer Jul 2012 #97
I'm Glad to Hear You Say That On the Road Jul 2012 #99
Be aware that you will most likely be classified as a believer here. cbayer Jul 2012 #100
Six Reasons We Can't Change the Future without Progressive Alchemy _ed_ Jul 2012 #72
Interesting topic and interesting thread. I agree with the points made about alliances pinto Jul 2012 #85
I simply don't think that 'progressive religion' has been excluded from LW movements at all LeftishBrit Jul 2012 #103
^^^^ This. trotsky Jul 2012 #109
Yes. Well stated. djean111 Jul 2012 #110
I don't think it means that progressives should become more religious at all. cbayer Jul 2012 #115
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Six Reasons We Can't Chan...»Reply #60