Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
41. Haster bin readin' "On Ilkla Moor Baht 'at"?
Tue Dec 27, 2011, 02:32 AM
Dec 2011

The song tells of a lover courting the object of his affections, Mary Jane, on Ilkley Moor without a hat (baht 'at). The singer chides the lover for his lack of headwear – for in the cold winds of Ilkley Moor this will mean his death from exposure. This will in turn result in his burial, the eating of his corpse by worms, the eating of the worms by ducks and finally the eating of the ducks by the singers.



1. Wheear 'as tha been since ah saw thee, I saw thee,
On Ilkla Moor baht 'at?
|: Wheear 'as tha bin since ah saw thee? :|
On Ilkla Moor baht hat, baht 'at,
|: On Ilkla Moor baht 'at? :|

2. I were a coortin' Mary Jane, Mary Jane,
On Ilkla Moor baht 'at.
|: I were a coortin' Mary Jane, :|
On Ilkla Moor baht hat, baht 'at,
|: On Ilkla Moor baht 'at. :|

3. Tha's bahn to get thi death o' cold . . .

4. Then we shall ha' to bury thee, bury thee . . .

5. Then t' worms 'll come an' ate thee up, ate thee up . . .

6. Then t' ducks 'll come an' ate up t' worms, ate up t' worms . . .

7. Then we shall come an' ate them ducks, ate them ducks...

8. Then we shall all 'av etten thee, etten thee . . .

9. That's how we get our oahn back, our oahn back . . .

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If you say you have faith and then don't follow up with deeds Angry Dragon Dec 2011 #1
And then, there are atheists who beieve in reincarnation. rug Dec 2011 #2
Does reincarnation require a deity? cleanhippie Dec 2011 #3
It requires a supernatural explanation. Skinner Dec 2011 #4
There is nothing supernatural about a blow fly's eggs, larva, pupa, and adult which.. MarkCharles Dec 2011 #6
But reincarnation, by definition, applies to the soul or spirit of something. cbayer Dec 2011 #7
If one looks at the root of that word, ... MarkCharles Dec 2011 #9
Now do a search for reincarnate and see if you can find a definition that cbayer Dec 2011 #10
OKAY! Let's look together! MarkCharles Dec 2011 #11
Interesting. The same site gives a different definition when used as a noun. cbayer Dec 2011 #12
Hey look! You are BOTH right! cleanhippie Dec 2011 #15
What is your definition of the word "reincarnation"? cbayer Dec 2011 #16
Does it matter? Unless you are stating that one needs a deity for reincarnation... cleanhippie Dec 2011 #19
It only matters insofar as I am interested in whether cbayer Dec 2011 #21
Me personally? I don't believe any such thing exists at all. cleanhippie Dec 2011 #22
Thanks for that reply. I would also be interested in the views cbayer Dec 2011 #23
Buddhist view on rebirth: tama Dec 2011 #43
While recycling of biomaterials... Silent3 Dec 2011 #27
Haster bin readin' "On Ilkla Moor Baht 'at"? Starboard Tack Dec 2011 #41
Belief in the supernatural has nothing to do with atheism. cleanhippie Dec 2011 #8
Not at all. mr blur Dec 2011 #13
Most, but not all, atheists are skeptics about the supernatural Silent3 Dec 2011 #26
Depends on whether you believe karma is divine. rug Dec 2011 #5
I concur Starboard Tack Dec 2011 #42
The bible is "proof" of nothing. nt mr blur Dec 2011 #14
Well, its "proof" if you are able to use your "other ways of knowing"!!! cleanhippie Dec 2011 #17
That must be the same proof for reincarnation. rug Dec 2011 #18
Agreed, but I'm not seeing your point. cleanhippie Dec 2011 #20
That "proof" has no essential relevance to belief ot nonbelief. rug Dec 2011 #24
Atheism is typically, even if not by definition... Silent3 Dec 2011 #28
No it isn't. rug Dec 2011 #30
A rejection based upon logic, or? MarkCharles Dec 2011 #32
It's a rejection based on a logical conundrum. rug Dec 2011 #33
It is a rejection of *a* God concept... Silent3 Dec 2011 #40
Nothing in science or rational inquiry skepticscott Dec 2011 #29
That's obviously true. rug Dec 2011 #31
That's only true skepticscott Dec 2011 #35
The topic is the relevance, or irrelevance, of science to atheism and theism. rug Dec 2011 #36
Uh, this old argument, for one skepticscott Dec 2011 #38
I remember that well, although what your post had to do with it eludes me. rug Dec 2011 #39
"We cannot teach people anything; we can only... MarkCharles Dec 2011 #25
I wonder his thoughts on the number pi... Taverner Dec 2011 #34
Doubtless irrational. rug Dec 2011 #37
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Geocentrism? Really? Gali...»Reply #41