Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Head Of Atheist Group Says Obama Shouldn’t Have Publicly Prayed For Shooting Victims [View all]2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)54. Hey, take a look at this.
BTW, you get no cookie for guessing who juror #5 is. Too easy.
At Sat Jul 21, 2012, 02:15 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
How hard is it to keep this bullshit out of your speech?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=36660
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Christian bullshit? This is an insult to all Christian DU'ers.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jul 21, 2012, 02:30 PM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Every group has bullshit coming out of it. Christians are certainly not exempt. I suggest the alerter respond to the post intelligently.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Stupid alert. Alerter should grow a thicker skin and engage the poster instead of trying to censor him. This post isn't out of bounds.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: It is his opinion and he has a right to it. Religion is not a protected group. No SOC violation here.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: Speaking as an agnostic, it's pretty much an insult to everybody. I could look to see what the first two edits were like, but I'm not at all sure I want to know.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
How hard is it to keep this bullshit out of your speech?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=36660
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Christian bullshit? This is an insult to all Christian DU'ers.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jul 21, 2012, 02:30 PM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Every group has bullshit coming out of it. Christians are certainly not exempt. I suggest the alerter respond to the post intelligently.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Stupid alert. Alerter should grow a thicker skin and engage the poster instead of trying to censor him. This post isn't out of bounds.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: It is his opinion and he has a right to it. Religion is not a protected group. No SOC violation here.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: Speaking as an agnostic, it's pretty much an insult to everybody. I could look to see what the first two edits were like, but I'm not at all sure I want to know.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Head Of Atheist Group Says Obama Shouldn’t Have Publicly Prayed For Shooting Victims [View all]
cbayer
Jul 2012
OP
No, he is upset that government official, acting in their official capacity, are espousing...
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#15
Do you have another line? I've seen this "privileged position" farce several times on this thread.
CAG
Jul 2012
#72
There are quite a few in these parts. And quite a few fair and respectful believers. And
cbayer
Jul 2012
#7
When you find anyone IMPOSING atheism on anyone, let us all know, will you?
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#16
If I thought for a second that you could be honest about the hypothetical situtation...
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#42
As a non-believer, I agree with you. President Obama did not jeopardize the separation of
Arkansas Granny
Jul 2012
#4
But they do not forfeit their individual rights. "Free" has a very definite meaning.
humblebum
Jul 2012
#13
Really? Cool. :) Can't member' the last time agreement on DU was this easy.
MichiganVote
Jul 2012
#69
Exactly how is the minority being screwed by the president saying a prayer?
bluestateguy
Jul 2012
#38
Nothing in Lemon v. Kurtzman precludes leaders from making religious statements
bluestateguy
Jul 2012
#40
As evidenced by the response you got to this, some are simply unable to step away
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#57