Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: A modest proposal [View all]Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)2. Here's the problem that I have with "eliminate all posts or threads....
that attempt to demean someone else's belief or non-belief."
It seems to me, from my perspective, that many believe that posts are demeaning their beliefs when they are just not giving them high levels respect and not just nodding your head and saying "that's awesome."
I don't know how we draw a line that is clear enough so that the rule can be followed. People on DU seem to feel fine with bashing the religious views of the right wing, of Mormons, of Scientologists, and others.
I have no problem with increased civility if it means an end to "organized atheism is as bad as the KKK."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
AD---of course, but why fight off people from somewhere else who say stupid hurtful things?
Thats my opinion
Dec 2011
#25
The problem with that is that some see any critique of a belief as demeaning, no matter how politely
iris27
Dec 2011
#3
For the record, atheists aren't the people trying to limit what's posted in this group.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2011
#11
It's simply not true that negative articles about non-religion are not acceptable here. The top
iris27
Dec 2011
#54
Defamed atheism. Would being told we're no different than the KKK qualify?
beam me up scottie
Dec 2011
#56
a good example of wanting to wallow some more in the toxic waste of r/t
Thats my opinion
Dec 2011
#72
I'd take your request more seriously if you apologized for your posts which demeaned non-believers.
laconicsax
Dec 2011
#24
IMO, the course of this thread clearly exhibits the continuing problems of this forum
struggle4progress
Dec 2011
#63
The stuff TMO claims he doesn't want to see is, and has always been, against the rules.
trotsky
Dec 2011
#65
I'll give it a try, reserving the position that this is far too general and complex
Thats my opinion
Dec 2011
#132
"Because much of life for all of us would be very one dimensional and grey without it."
cleanhippie
Dec 2011
#135
Are you asking that certain opinions, statements, and stories not be posted here?
darkstar3
Dec 2011
#120
I have answered that question over and over again. The latest is in #45
Thats my opinion
Dec 2011
#104
The reason we have a problem is that your repeated "answers" and clarifications...
trotsky
Dec 2011
#107
Yeah, I think we've got enough confusion with the various groups that exist already.
iris27
Dec 2011
#138