Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

MineralMan

(151,287 posts)

10. Nice touch of Gilgoff to use "closeted atheists"

Reply to rug (Original post)

Wed Aug 1, 2012, 03:11 PM

Aug 2012

later in the article. In doing that, he's trying to tie atheists to another group the fundamentalist Christians despise. Would that fundamentalists would take Jesus' words to heart and go into their own closets to prey (spelling intentional, of course).

Isn't it fun to find atheist-bashing stuff on the internet and then post it without any comment? I think that's fun for you. You get all the bashing without any effort on your part. Bravo, rug, bravo! Plausible deniability...what a concept.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Where was God in Aurora?' comments show Internet as church for atheists [View all] rug Aug 2012 OP

Really interesting assessment here. I am interested in what others think cbayer Aug 2012 #1

I don't think any group has a monopoly on the "where was God in Aurora?" question KurtNYC Aug 2012 #3

He makes some good points about anonymity and the need for groups cbayer Aug 2012 #4

To me he describes a world where you are either part of a church or you are KurtNYC Aug 2012 #5

That's a valid personal opinion but not fact. cbayer Aug 2012 #6

Inflammatory, insulting skepticscott Aug 2012 #25

No i do not believe he was cindyperry2010 Aug 2012 #2

Yawn. Must try harder. nt mr blur Aug 2012 #7

As many of us atheists keep trying to say in this very group, trotsky Aug 2012 #8

Why, oh why, why do believers need to paint atheism as a religion. Goblinmonger Aug 2012 #9

If it walks like a duck. nt humblebum Aug 2012 #18

Since it definitionally lacks a duck, it can neither walk like one or be one. dmallind Aug 2012 #19

Ducks gather where ducks gather, atheists gather in the religion group. Looks humblebum Aug 2012 #20

Nice touch of Gilgoff to use "closeted atheists" MineralMan Aug 2012 #10

Isn't that the obverse of coming out atheist? rug Aug 2012 #11

I have no idea, rug. MineralMan Aug 2012 #13

You must have had a birthday recently. Happy birthday! rug Aug 2012 #16

I did, yes. Just this weekend. As usual I continued my work. MineralMan Aug 2012 #17

While he uses a few terms which are questionable, I don't think this is really an atheist cbayer Aug 2012 #12

I disagree. Perhaps we're looking at it from MineralMan Aug 2012 #14

Not meaningless at all skepticscott Aug 2012 #26

Aside from the "closeted atheists" MineralMan Aug 2012 #15

Of course you don't. cleanhippie Aug 2012 #30

Evangelism? Don't think so. dimbear Aug 2012 #21

Another meaning is attempt to convert. cbayer Aug 2012 #22

It would have been a better choice of words had the author chosen what you choose, dimbear Aug 2012 #23

I agree about some of the language he used here. cbayer Aug 2012 #24

I don't believe you really thought that post all the way through. trotsky Aug 2012 #29

Wait until he finds out about the Unitarian Universalist Church!!! Manifestor_of_Light Aug 2012 #27

So, where was god in Aurora? Kalidurga Aug 2012 #28