Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

rug

(82,333 posts)

10. That is neither snark nor mockery.

Reply to trotsky (Reply #9)

Tue Aug 14, 2012, 08:08 AM

Aug 2012

I agree you have done no mocking - in this thread. Neither have I.

But that's not really the point of this thread. The point is the weaponizing of Christianity. That is a serious enough problem for everyone to put down the snark, sniping and mockery.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Atheists contest treatment from Camp Pendleton [View all] rug Aug 2012 OP

They're pissing upwind pscot Aug 2012 #1

Me too. rug Aug 2012 #2

Is it not reasonable to fight against discrimination at the personal level... trotsky Aug 2012 #3

Yes. rug Aug 2012 #4

So you say: trotsky Aug 2012 #5

I mocked the FFRF for going after the restaurant. rug Aug 2012 #6

Yet you say both struggles are important. trotsky Aug 2012 #7

My cats are important. rug Aug 2012 #8

I have done no mocking in this thread. trotsky Aug 2012 #9

That is neither snark nor mockery. rug Aug 2012 #10

It is both. trotsky Aug 2012 #11

Ok, I see which path you've taken. rug Aug 2012 #12

And it's clear which one you're on. trotsky Aug 2012 #13

Surprisingly, I don't come on here to talk about me. rug Aug 2012 #14

When your behavior distracts from the issues, it's a problem. trotsky Aug 2012 #15

When you consistently try to make the issue the poster and not the post, it's a problem. rug Aug 2012 #17

Then quit being a problem, rug. trotsky Aug 2012 #19

There was no snarky comment there. rug Aug 2012 #21

Your defensiveness tells all. trotsky Aug 2012 #22

At least he's consistent. Goblinmonger Aug 2012 #23

Consistent and transparent. trotsky Aug 2012 #27

To be defensive there must be a threat. rug Aug 2012 #24

"no comment on substance"? trotsky Aug 2012 #25

None at all. rug Aug 2012 #26

Glad they are challenging this, particularly as a coalition. cbayer Aug 2012 #16

He's worse than a loose cannon. rug Aug 2012 #18

Yikes! How did this get so much sway within the military establishment? cbayer Aug 2012 #20