Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
11. It is both.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 08:13 AM
Aug 2012

It is sad and disappointing you refuse to admit it, or failing that, just edit your post out of good faith anyway.

I agree that the weaponization of Christianity is a critical issue. We agree that it should be fought at the institutional and individual level. Your disparaging comment about the church bulletin discount issue is not helpful and many find it insulting. It distracts from the fight against a problem we agree exists.

But if you still refuse, so be it. You choose to be the person you are.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They're pissing upwind pscot Aug 2012 #1
Me too. rug Aug 2012 #2
Is it not reasonable to fight against discrimination at the personal level... trotsky Aug 2012 #3
Yes. rug Aug 2012 #4
So you say: trotsky Aug 2012 #5
I mocked the FFRF for going after the restaurant. rug Aug 2012 #6
Yet you say both struggles are important. trotsky Aug 2012 #7
My cats are important. rug Aug 2012 #8
I have done no mocking in this thread. trotsky Aug 2012 #9
That is neither snark nor mockery. rug Aug 2012 #10
It is both. trotsky Aug 2012 #11
Ok, I see which path you've taken. rug Aug 2012 #12
And it's clear which one you're on. trotsky Aug 2012 #13
Surprisingly, I don't come on here to talk about me. rug Aug 2012 #14
When your behavior distracts from the issues, it's a problem. trotsky Aug 2012 #15
When you consistently try to make the issue the poster and not the post, it's a problem. rug Aug 2012 #17
Then quit being a problem, rug. trotsky Aug 2012 #19
There was no snarky comment there. rug Aug 2012 #21
Your defensiveness tells all. trotsky Aug 2012 #22
At least he's consistent. Goblinmonger Aug 2012 #23
Consistent and transparent. trotsky Aug 2012 #27
To be defensive there must be a threat. rug Aug 2012 #24
"no comment on substance"? trotsky Aug 2012 #25
None at all. rug Aug 2012 #26
Glad they are challenging this, particularly as a coalition. cbayer Aug 2012 #16
He's worse than a loose cannon. rug Aug 2012 #18
Yikes! How did this get so much sway within the military establishment? cbayer Aug 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Atheists contest treatmen...»Reply #11