Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 11:42 AM Aug 2012

Atheism+: the new New Atheists [View all]

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/religion/2012/08/atheism-plus-new-new-atheists

This new movement has an energy that makes it hard to ignore.
BY NELSON JONES PUBLISHED 23 AUGUST 2012 15:41


Atheism+ is a reaction against the "New Atheism" of Richard Dawkins. Photograph: Getty Images


Let me introduce you to Atheism+, the nascent movement that might be the most exciting thing to hit the world of unbelief since Richard Dawkins teamed up with Christopher Hitchens to tell the world that God was a Delusion and, worse than that, Not Great.

Less than a week old in its current form, Atheism+ is the brainchild of Jen McCreight, a Seattle-based biology postgrad and blogger at the secularist Freethought network. She has called for a "new wave" of atheism on that "cares about how religion affects everyone and that applies skepticism to everything, including social issues like sexism, racism, politics, poverty, and crime."

On one level, this is just the logical culmination of the huge upsurge in interest prompted by the so-called "New Atheists" and the growth over the last few years of a recognisable community or movement based around ideas of atheism, scientific scepticism and a progressive political agenda. While atheism is, by definition, no more or less than a non-belief in God, in practice it clusters with a variety of other positions, from pro-choice to campaigns against homeopathy. People who espouse "liberal atheism" as it might be called, oppose religion for political as well as philosophical reasons, just as the forces of religion seem to line up - though of course not exclusively - behind seemingly unconnected issues such as opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage and, in the US, gun-control.

Atheism+ is, at its most basic, an attempt wrap things together more formally, to create a movement that prioritises issues of equality and does so from an explicitly non-religious perspective. Some would say that such a philosophy already exists in the form of humanism. Others prefer the label Skeptic. Atheism+, however, seeks to capitalise on the sense of identity that has grown up around the word "atheism" during the past few years. One supporter of the idea, Greta Christina, celebrates the term as "a slap in the face that wakes people up."

more at link
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just someone else who wants attention skepticscott Aug 2012 #1
Is that where the "skeptic" comes from in your handle? dkf Aug 2012 #2
If atheism is simply disbelief in a god or gods, how does it become a "movement"... TreasonousBastard Aug 2012 #3
Because many organizations, conferences and even rallies have formed around atheism. cbayer Aug 2012 #5
Point taken, but maybe the term "movement" doesn't quite fit. The questions of... TreasonousBastard Aug 2012 #11
Then it's just semantics, but I do think there is a strong and appropriate proactive cbayer Aug 2012 #13
Is an organization based on resisting Xian hegemony in law and society really irrational? dmallind Aug 2012 #7
Agree. That is why the simplistic reduction of the term atheist is problematic. cbayer Aug 2012 #9
Again, point taken, but I've always seen "movements" as pro-active, not... TreasonousBastard Aug 2012 #12
It depends on how you look at it. eqfan592 Aug 2012 #16
You seem unaware of the Texas Repub senate candidate who says the UN is threatening golf courses muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #18
Not even new either dmallind Aug 2012 #4
Except this group has some distinctive items on their agenda, cbayer Aug 2012 #6
You might want to contact Marie Castle, who founded AFHR, then. dmallind Aug 2012 #8
Not familiar with her, but do you think that the complaints of sexism within some of cbayer Aug 2012 #10
There is sexism in many groups. That it exists doesn't MineralMan Aug 2012 #15
Some atheists, like some religious folk, want MineralMan Aug 2012 #14
Not to be confused with "Atheism 3.0" onager Aug 2012 #17
it seems premature to call it a new movement with energy muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #19
"Atheism + : Opposing ageism, racism and sexism. Old white men need not apply." - Paula Kirby onager Aug 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Atheism+: the new New Ath...»Reply #0