Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: On Reconciling Atheism and Meaning in the Universe [View all]Jim__
(15,233 posts)21. Interesting interview. It leads me to 2 main thoughts.
Speaking about the soul:
It could in principle survive death by using technology - if my brain has some fancy reconstruction technology to transcribe it into software on silicon. In principle this simulacrum could survive death and have aspects of the old me. Unless I have a backup code, my soul dies when my brain dies. End of game, unfortunately.
I'm not sure that even if we can preserve our brain structures, our self, or soul, survives death. Would a machine that has the same thoughts as me, be me? I don't think so. Whatever constitutes me, is more than just my thoughts, and when I die, even if some type of copy of my brain lives on, I don't believe that I do.
And on Mindscope:
We've started with a very large donation from Paul Allen, who is very interested in trying to understand the cortex. It's one of the most complex systems in the known universe. This 10-year project called MindScope has enormous resources - between 200 and 300 scientists and engineers - all focused on trying to understand the cortex, particularly the visual cortex. We want to understand its complete wiring and the structure down to the level of a single neuron. Some people call this the connectome. The Allen Institute for Brain Science is somewhere between a university and a biotech company, where we can focus all our resources to try to understand the cortex.
I hope I live to see what happens with that project.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
131 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"...he writes about his hunger for meaning...." We put meaning in the universe...
GodlessBiker
Aug 2012
#1
No. It's simply an attribute of consciousness to create meaning in the world.
GodlessBiker
Aug 2012
#20
But an instinct isn't equivalent to meaning. It's just another background fact which helps create..
GodlessBiker
Aug 2012
#44
We have quite a lot of evidence that we are only nibbling at the edges of how many stars and
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2012
#75
Well, since you're the one claiming waves don't exist unless someone measures them, this is overdue.
rug
Aug 2012
#85
I wasn't personifying nature, simply using vocabulary that is easy to understand.
cleanhippie
Aug 2012
#17
Not exactly sure how you could have possibly gotten that from what he wote... (nt)
eqfan592
Aug 2012
#33
"Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?" - thanks for ...
Jim__
Aug 2012
#114
They're using fucked-up semantics - The word "random" has several different meanings.
bananas
Aug 2012
#125
"directly related to the ways its inherited traits function in the context of its local environment"
FiveGoodMen
Aug 2012
#42
More like atheists don't require the crutch of imaginary imposed meaning by others upon the universe
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2012
#55
I believe that if you transcribed everything about my brain onto a mechanical device
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2012
#57
I don't know whether reincarnation into computers is possible, I'm making an educated guess it's not
cpwm17
Aug 2012
#102
I think I just saw the structure of the universe in the last topic I saw...
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2012
#83