Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

cbayer

(146,218 posts)

5. I think the issue here is that they provide food and transportation for other groups that

Reply to pinto (Reply #4)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 04:18 PM

Aug 2012

meet after hours.

The court called this on "viewpoint discrimination".

I tend to agree with you that this crosses the line, but would be curious to know what other kinds of groups they have.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court rules for religious group on after-school access [View all] rug Aug 2012 OP

Are there no churches in Minneapolis? I do not approve of this use of public property. sinkingfeeling Aug 2012 #1

If they let other clubs use the building Goblinmonger Aug 2012 #2

I don't like it, but this is prob correct longship Aug 2012 #3

Bad call. There were school district funds attached to "after-school partner" status. pinto Aug 2012 #4

I think the issue here is that they provide food and transportation for other groups that cbayer Aug 2012 #5

How fast do you think the Child Evangelism Fellowship would scream Bloody Murder Tyrs WolfDaemon Aug 2012 #6