Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SarahM32

(270 posts)
53. Ah, but you miss some very crucial facts.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 03:58 PM
Sep 2012

Petrushka,

There are instances were the webmaster at that site uses the word “we” indicating that he speaks for the Coalition, and it is explained that the message on the Coalition site was preserved from the original web site of the original author. But I can see why you would assume that he writes in the third person and that he is the messenger himself.

It's possible. But to me that's immaterial. To me, I think you are trying to shoot the messenger down, and ignore the message. And to me, it’s the message that’s important, and crucial.

As for your concern about “misquoting” Jesus, I too had noticed that he changed a word to say “his generation” rather than “this generation,” which we see in the official church canon. I too wondered about that. But, having read About Christianity, Prophecies Re: He Who Fulfills Them, The Second Coming Story, and other relevant articles, I understand why.

I will try to explain by pointing out that the quote about “this generation” (or “his generation”) comes from this larger context:

Jesus said: "The days will come when people will want to see one of the days of the son of man, and they shall not see it. So they will look here and there, but do not follow them. For as the lightning lightens all parts under heaven, so shall also the (work of the) son of man be in his day. But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected by his (or this) generation." (Luke 17:20-25)

In the first place, there were instances where the writers of the New Testament reported that Jesus spoke of “this generation” or “you” when he was not speaking of their generation or them, but of the generation that would exist when prophecy was fulfilled at the end of the age. Remember, Jesus said: “I come not to bring peace, but division,” knowing that he ushered in an age of division and conflict.

For example, it is written that “you shall hear rumors of war, and nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, and these will be the beginning of sorrows,” etc. And in such instances Jesus was talking about what would be happening now, at the end of the age (aeon) that he ushered in.

In the second place, there were also instances when they spoke of “this generation” meaning their generation, erroneously believing that prophecies would be fulfilled during their lifetimes.

For example, Matthew 23:36 says “All these things shall come upon this generation.” Matthew 24:34 says: “This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.” Mark 13:30 says: “This generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.” Luke 21:32 says: “This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled.” Revelation 1:1 says: “The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John.” And Paul wrote as if the “end” was near and even immanent, and he was trying to prepare his generation for it.

Additionally, there is further proof that Jesus was not speaking of himself in Luke 17:20-25 and other instances where he said the son of man to come would “first be rejected by this generation.”

For example, Jesus was accepted by multitudes of people in his generation. That is made clear throughout the book of Matthew and in the book of Luke. Even Matthew 4:25 states: "Great multitudes followed Him, from Galilee, and from Decapolis, Jerusalem, Judea, and beyond the Jordan." Matthew 13:14 states: "Hearing of this, the crowds followed him on foot from the towns." Luke 14:25 states that: "Great multitudes went with him, and he turned to them and said..."

Those are but a few parts of the story of Jesus that make it very clear that he spoke to the multitudes who followed him during his travels on foot, on the roads and streets. And that was also confirmed by an impartial Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus, who wrote at the time that Jesus "won over many Jews and many of the Greeks" in his generation.

Additionally, Jesus suffered only on the last day of his life, not first or beforehand, but only after he had completed his mission. Therefore, Jesus was not speaking of himself but the next son of man who would “first be rejected by his generation” — whose message (work) is sent before him according the Isaiah’s prophecy, and can be seen in a flash, like lightning, all over the world (over the Internet) according to Jesus’ prophecy.

Jesus spoke of the end of the age when he warned us of the great conflict and tribulation caused by the hypocrites, deceptive leaders, false christs, false shepherds and false prophets. And he was speaking of the end of the age when he spoke of the coming of the son of man, saying that all the conflict and war and tribulation would be signs prior to his coming.

Jesus essentially said: "I tell you the truth: I must go away, but I will send the Counselor to you. He will righteously judge the world; because I am going to heaven and you will see me no more. I came not to judge the world, but the rulers of this world must be judged. I have much more to say to you, but it is more than you can now bear. But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all truth. He will not speak of himself, because of himself he will do nothing but the will of the one who sent him. He will [write and] speak only what he hears from God, and he will tell you what is to come. He will glorify me by having what is mine and making it known to you." (Paraphrasing and clarifying John 8:28, John 12:47, and John 16 verses 7-15)

Jesus clearly revealed that because he had to go away and would be seen no more on earth, he would send someone delivering a needed message, who will issue the judgment, guide humanity unto the truth, show you things to come, and declare the testimony of the Christ-Avatar who is in heaven with God.

(This information was quoted or paraphrased from Prophecies Re: He Who Fulfills Them.)
.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Interesting. MineralMan Aug 2012 #1
As a seminary graduate I'd say: Ezlivin Aug 2012 #2
As a scholar help me out here please - Nazareth wasn't in the Bible? dballance Aug 2012 #3
I don't recall discussing that in seminary Ezlivin Aug 2012 #11
So the seminary does not cover the whole Bible in their classes? LiberalFighter Aug 2012 #16
No, not at all Ezlivin Aug 2012 #17
I wasn't referring to Nazareth or anything like that. LiberalFighter Aug 2012 #18
We covered it all Ezlivin Aug 2012 #19
Thank you for the insight. LiberalFighter Aug 2012 #20
I hope not Ezlivin Aug 2012 #24
Madelyn Murray O'Hare and Jim Morrison were seminary students alfredo Aug 2012 #26
Jesus being "from Nazareth" or being a "Nazarene" is mentioned 28 times in the NT. SarahM32 Aug 2012 #12
Thanks for the info. Which Bible Version? dballance Aug 2012 #14
Here are the numbers from KJV and NIV SarahM32 Aug 2012 #23
Most seminary graduates would not say no. They're taught the answer is yes. SarahM32 Aug 2012 #7
K&R - I want to hear from someone who knows the answers to the poster and the commenters. northoftheborder Aug 2012 #4
You're asking for a bit too much. An area of a great deal of disagreement. dimbear Aug 2012 #28
The three Isaiah and Jesus Thats my opinion Aug 2012 #5
Yes, many scholars say the book of Isaiah had three authors. But ... SarahM32 Aug 2012 #10
3 authors from 3 completely diferent periods of Judean History intaglio Aug 2012 #22
The translated quote from Isaiah that you include has a lot of the same cbayer Aug 2012 #6
Handel uses several exclusively Old Testament texts--and this is one. nt Thats my opinion Aug 2012 #8
Handel used Isaiah's words. SarahM32 Aug 2012 #9
Interesting website. Linguistically, historically I'm interested in the course of bible translations pinto Aug 2012 #13
Background and purpose of the site. SarahM32 Aug 2012 #15
One big problem intaglio Aug 2012 #21
It's not really a problem. SarahM32 Aug 2012 #25
The site you so proudly promote intaglio Aug 2012 #27
Not so. In fact, the site refutes the theology of Christian Apologetics. SarahM32 Aug 2012 #29
Being Jeffersonian does not mean that you abandon apologetics intaglio Aug 2012 #30
Intaglio, I disagree. And here's why: SarahM32 Aug 2012 #32
I said he was an apologist. Many faiths have apologists intaglio Aug 2012 #35
No. Jefferson was not an Apologist. And furthermore ... SarahM32 Aug 2012 #36
Well I can forgive you for misreading my sentence about Jefferson intaglio Aug 2012 #38
Well, since you put it that way ... I will say this: SarahM32 Sep 2012 #48
There are literary apologists intaglio Sep 2012 #49
Oh brother. SarahM32 Sep 2012 #50
You have stopped listening intaglio Sep 2012 #51
'Tis the other way around. SarahM32 Sep 2012 #54
You continue in your false description of apologetics intaglio Sep 2012 #55
Please. Let's be accurate. SarahM32 Sep 2012 #57
Again, apologetics is not just Christian, Isa is not the word you used intaglio Sep 2012 #59
Again, that's not relevant and avoids the issue. And ... SarahM32 Sep 2012 #60
I repeat only to be ignored by you again intaglio Sep 2012 #61
Okay, for the last time ... SarahM32 Sep 2012 #62
You distort and ignore, you are trapped in a web of deceit intaglio Sep 2012 #63
The relationship between Old Testament materials Thats my opinion Aug 2012 #31
Well, I wouldn't say that. SarahM32 Aug 2012 #33
Again you are speaking of "The Book of Isaiah" as if it is a singular production intaglio Aug 2012 #34
No, I am not. SarahM32 Aug 2012 #37
A fiat that you are right and others are wrong intaglio Aug 2012 #39
I think both of you have made some serious points. Thats my opinion Aug 2012 #41
Thanks. And ... SarahM32 Aug 2012 #43
Why it's more than mere hope. SarahM32 Sep 2012 #65
It has nothing to do with "profession" or money. SarahM32 Sep 2012 #66
There's an introduction to the 1611 King James Bible by its translators indicating Petrushka Aug 2012 #40
However, Strong in particular, Thats my opinion Aug 2012 #42
Yes. Thank you again. SarahM32 Aug 2012 #45
Petrushka, that's just more Apologetics, and ... SarahM32 Aug 2012 #44
Thanks for the link. Just discovered what the "messenger for the Spirit of truth" believes . . . Petrushka Aug 2012 #46
That story was published in February 2002. There's a more recent one online. SarahM32 Aug 2012 #47
FWIW: The writer of those articles, refers to himself in the thrid person, saying . . . Petrushka Sep 2012 #52
Ah, but you miss some very crucial facts. SarahM32 Sep 2012 #53
"...when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all truth." ?? Petrushka Sep 2012 #56
So, in other words, you will not address the facts, and simply ignore the truth? SarahM32 Sep 2012 #58
Why it's important that the book of Isaiah is not about Jesus SarahM32 Sep 2012 #64
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Does the book of Isaiah s...»Reply #53