Religion

rug

(82,333 posts)

15. Yes shit, Capt. Persecuted.

Tue Sep 11, 2012, 02:21 PM

Sep 2012

The fact is this is an ongoing lawsuit involving the 9/11 Memorial. This is 9/11. If it embarasses you to talk about it, that's life. You must be brittle if you consider an article on a lawsuit brought by an atheist organization to be a "jab at atheists".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Atheists continue battle against World Trade Center cross at memorial [View all] rug Sep 2012 OP

lol MrDiaz Sep 2012 #1

Are they going to include the crescent moon symbol of the Islam? How about the Star of David? rfranklin Sep 2012 #2

Were any of those things found in the rubble? Did any of those things take on cbayer Sep 2012 #11

I doubt any one would have noticed them. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #51

Who said anything a bout a god *allowing* or *leaving* anything. cbayer Sep 2012 #52

You suggested it. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #53

I in no way suggested that. If that is what you read, then I wasn't clear. cbayer Sep 2012 #54

Put it in the Museum, not at the Memorial HockeyMom Sep 2012 #3

It is at the museum. cbayer Sep 2012 #8

So an article with no new information published on Sept 10 Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #4

It gets his post count up... rexcat Sep 2012 #5

It's not my lawsuit. rug Sep 2012 #7

I didn't say it was... rexcat Sep 2012 #12

You did respond to him but you made the usual snide comment about me. rug Sep 2012 #14

Substance? See post 13. rexcat Sep 2012 #17

I did and it has no substance. rug Sep 2012 #18

This country and New York City in particular... rexcat Sep 2012 #20

I don't disagree with anything you wrote, with one exception. rug Sep 2012 #27

I will respectfully disagree with you... rexcat Sep 2012 #29

It's 9/11. rug Sep 2012 #6

No shit, Capt Obvious. Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #10

Yes shit, Capt. Persecuted. rug Sep 2012 #15

I'll talk about it whenever you want Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #16

I'll discuss it when you're in a less friable state. rug Sep 2012 #19

Maybe you can stop being passive aggressive about it Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #21

Maybe you can stop imputing motives to others that suit your world view. rug Sep 2012 #24

Then do tell. Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #30

What would the atheist group like displayed? They don't say. cbayer Sep 2012 #9

The "cross" is an aberration of the wreakage... rexcat Sep 2012 #13

My favorite line in the article "This case is about inclusion,....of everyone." Leontius Sep 2012 #22

For somebody who claims to not understand privilege Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #31

Sorry I couldn't stop the airplanes... onager Sep 2012 #23

Gee, God sounds so bitter and small. rug Sep 2012 #25

And you accuse me and others having no substance... rexcat Sep 2012 #26

I just responded to #20. rug Sep 2012 #28

Thanks! Nice to see you and Pat Robertson fighting Evil Atheists together. onager Sep 2012 #32

If that's what you see, you should have something checked. rug Sep 2012 #33

Do you distance yourself from the ACLJ? Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #34

Oh, please. rug Sep 2012 #35

I notice you didn't answer the question. Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #36

It's an insulting question, as well as a stupid one. rug Sep 2012 #37

No idea why it is insulting, but, here, I'll answer it first: Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #38

Let me see, why on earth is this insulting? rug Sep 2012 #39

If you answer the question Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #40

You really are in no position to bargain with me. rug Sep 2012 #41

I'm not bargaining with you. Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #42

No, you're not. rug Sep 2012 #43

Still no answer, huh? Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #44

"on record" rug Sep 2012 #45

Why would I need to guess? Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #46

Do you honestly not know the answer? rug Sep 2012 #47

I oppose the atheists on this one Fortinbras Armstrong Sep 2012 #48

So you support "Christian privilege" according to Leontius Sep 2012 #49

Nope that isn't privilege Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #50

Yes sir you are a real . Leontius Sep 2012 #55

I'm sure this is going to be far too nuanced for you, but here it goes Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #57

Which part of "the ACLJ argument is also bogus" do you have difficulty with? Fortinbras Armstrong Sep 2012 #56

Which part of the ACLJ argument do you think is bogus? cbayer Sep 2012 #58

From the article Goblinmonger Sep 2012 #59

This bit Fortinbras Armstrong Sep 2012 #61

I agree that that is bogus. cbayer Sep 2012 #62

Rev Brian Jordan Leontius Sep 2012 #67

Don't know anything about the ACLJ argument from this article Leontius Sep 2012 #66

Persecution! mr blur Sep 2012 #60

Except it's not theists here claiming persecution and filing a lawsuit. rug Sep 2012 #65

Look, the murderers didn't attack Christians on 9/11, they attacked Americans. mr blur Sep 2012 #63

If the symbol which you offer had been discovered in the rubble and become a central cbayer Sep 2012 #64