Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(15,223 posts)
19. No, actually, it's not the same thing.
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 07:08 AM
Sep 2012
"I was not concerned that Richard was an anti-semitic at all," he said.

"I was concerned that he was using an anti-semitic stereotype, which has run through a certain strand of the Christian reading of what is called the 'Old Testament' as a result of which thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of Jews, died in the Middle Ages because that's how people spoke about the God of the Old Testament."


A person can use a steroetype that is embedded in their culture without even being aware of it. That is what Sacks claims Dawkins is doing. He explicitly states that he does not consider Dawkins to be antisemitic.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I read about this earlier. Apparently things got somewhat heated. cbayer Sep 2012 #1
"christian atheists" and "jewish atheists" WTF? mike_c Sep 2012 #2
This is how I understand it. cbayer Sep 2012 #5
Bull... rexcat Sep 2012 #6
OT vs Torah........ dimbear Sep 2012 #18
So Dawkins should not point out that the God of the OT edhopper Sep 2012 #20
Where did I say I agreed with the Rabbi? cbayer Sep 2012 #21
I am atheist coming from a Jewish perspective. edhopper Sep 2012 #22
Thanks for the clarification. cbayer Sep 2012 #23
Here's 3 short video clips covering the same part of the debate. Jim__ Sep 2012 #3
I'm sure the entire "debate" will soon be up on You Tube HarveyDarkey Sep 2012 #17
Talk is cheap... rexcat Sep 2012 #4
Maybe I should listen more to that bit of advice from SJG. 2ndAmForComputers Sep 2012 #7
He doesn't call Dawkins anti-semitic, he says the passage is antisemitic. Jim__ Sep 2012 #8
Suuuuuuure. 2ndAmForComputers Sep 2012 #9
Sacks explicitly makes that statement. Jim__ Sep 2012 #11
Really????????? rexcat Sep 2012 #12
No, actually, it's not the same thing. Jim__ Sep 2012 #19
Do you prefer the objectivity of Pharyngula? rug Sep 2012 #10
I would just prefer objectivity... rexcat Sep 2012 #13
I think he just wanted to snipe at P.Z. Myers. onager Sep 2012 #14
No, PZ's too busy feuding with Thunderfoot. rug Sep 2012 #15
More like... rexcat Sep 2012 #16
RD and RS Yesspam Sep 2012 #24
If this is spam it is the Picasso of spam. rug Sep 2012 #25
I was thinking more along the lines of Salvador Dali. cbayer Sep 2012 #26
what a bunch of nonsense davidb19766 Sep 2012 #27
What a bunch Yesspam Sep 2012 #28
I hope you will post often. Welcome to our little circle of friends. n/t dimbear Sep 2012 #29
I agree and disagree here Meshuga Mar 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Chief Rabbi Lord Sacks an...»Reply #19