Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

ButterflyBlood

(12,644 posts)

1. That law is obviously unconstitutional

Reply to salvorhardin (Original post)

Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:35 AM

Oct 2012

And as the article notes was tossed out by a judge allowing this guy to name his company what he wanted. Making comparisons to modern day Middle Eastern countries absurd.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

America's war on blasphemy [View all] salvorhardin Oct 2012 OP

That law is obviously unconstitutional ButterflyBlood Oct 2012 #1

Reading comprehension is an under appreciated skill salvorhardin Oct 2012 #2

Why should he have had to incur the expense of a lawsuit? Oregonian Oct 2012 #3

Sometimes it takes a case like to to get a dusty old law reopened and rejected, cbayer Oct 2012 #4