Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

(146,218 posts)

17. Too narrow for others who may not share your pov

Fri Oct 5, 2012, 04:27 PM

Oct 2012

No need for you to expand or modify your definition at all. Just perhaps recognize that it is by no means universally held.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

wow d_r Oct 2012 #1

+ struggle4progress Oct 2012 #2

I heard that when Einstein died, he was reading... onager Oct 2012 #8

Einstein is often said to be a pantheist. longship Oct 2012 #3

Well, Darwin called himself an agnostic... longship Oct 2012 #6

I know that Darwin struggled and it's unclear where he landed. cbayer Oct 2012 #7

I could not agree more with your post. longship Oct 2012 #9

By any strong conception of "god" or deity... Silent3 Oct 2012 #10

You cold be right or you could be wrong. cbayer Oct 2012 #11

Just because we might not be able to "imagine what there may be"... trotsky Oct 2012 #12

Using your definition, I would agree cbayer Oct 2012 #15

Too narrow for what? Silent3 Oct 2012 #16

Too narrow for others who may not share your pov cbayer Oct 2012 #17

That is fair, though many may choose not to have that meaningful cbayer Oct 2012 #19

Sure such things are open to judgment Silent3 Oct 2012 #20

Well, that letter kinda blows the "ambivalence" to smithereens, innit? 2ndAmForComputers Oct 2012 #13