Irreverence isn't bigotry, because ideas and beliefs are not people.

[Humanist_Activist]

25. So you take quotes out of context to label him a bigot? How dishonest is that?

Religious leaders, such as priests, ministers, clerics, clergy, and acolytes et al, exert their leadership by claiming to be fellow followers of an invisible, silent entity that speaks and communicates through them.

First off, I don't see this as generalized, but rather a statement of fact, it lacks nuance, it doesn't specify the religion, but its no more bigoted than saying the Christians exert their leadership by claiming to be followers of Jesus Christ. That's just a statement of fact, he generalized the supernatural to cover all religions, but I don't see where it is bigoted or inaccurate.

Supposed adherents to religions, whose holy scriptures claim that their god is the only true god, and that all other religions must be shunned, and whose followers must be either converted or killed, should not be praying together.

This is yet another statement that is even more a statement of fact, rather than bigotry, granted he could have been more specific, like specifying the Abrahamic Religions, which I think is what he's talking about, but generally this is an opinion on the incongruity in people worshiping together who hold, in many cases, incompatible beliefs, and that's putting it lightly. Again, not bigotry, can you give an example of bigotry from his article?