Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Is there a new face of atheism? [View all]rug
(82,333 posts)51. It would be more accurate to say religious belief.
Regarding bmus' snark, do you think atheism should be discussed in the Religion Group?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
With the ever-increasing numbers of non-believers, it will no longer be easy to pigonhole them
cleanhippie
Oct 2012
#1
I'm not sure I can agree with that. Non-believers are becoming more vocal about the intrusion of
cleanhippie
Oct 2012
#3
But "Most atheists have no interest in activism about their atheism" is clearly true
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2012
#18
The article doesn't say it needs eiteher. It's a report on what is happening, need or no.
rug
Oct 2012
#15
It's the title of the Irish Times article that the editors chose to run with the piece.
pinto
Oct 2012
#23
But as the *voice* of atheism, you may have some interest in what they have to say
cbayer
Oct 2012
#49
Let' see, old atheism = lack of belief in god(s), new atheism = lack of belief in god(s).
beam me up scottie
Oct 2012
#34
Discussing an ethical society that is not based on religious belief is much more interesting
rug
Oct 2012
#35
One would think that constantly trying to redefine atheism to create a strawman would get old.
beam me up scottie
Oct 2012
#38