Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
4. I like the term "religiously unaffiliated". You called it "atheist"
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:13 PM
Nov 2012

I am both, but of the two, "unaffiliated" is a more accurate description because "atheism" implies I believe something. Instead the supernatural is irrelevant to me. I don't believe it exists so I don't give it a minute's thought most days.

Another way to define this demographic is people who highly value knowledge, education, facts, and reason, and that is not incompatible with a person having some religious beliefs as well. One might have thought that should be pretty near 100% of the population , but we know that isn't the case.

I think we will do better if we focus on people who highly value knowledge, education, facts, and reason. We can be sure we'll get no competition from the GOP on that one. It isn't necessary to have a litmus test as to whether a person believes in the supernatural as long as they have the view that here on Earth, the important things are knowledge, education, facts, and reason. No point in arguing about what may or may not exist in the supernatural. We can't prove anything and it doesn't really change what we have to do here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The GOP really appeals to me when they use "God" in every second sentence. rzemanfl Nov 2012 #1
As long as it isn't the mormons. nt lyingsackofmitt Nov 2012 #2
How does nonbelief affect politics? rug Nov 2012 #3
Knee-jerk reaction against the more religious party, perhaps? LAGC Nov 2012 #21
I like the term "religiously unaffiliated". You called it "atheist" BlueStreak Nov 2012 #4
Well said! nt. Starboard Tack Nov 2012 #5
Actually, "atheism" is quite explicit; lack of belief. cleanhippie Nov 2012 #6
Atheist implies you don't believe something. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #8
Then you cannot define a demographic group around it BlueStreak Nov 2012 #9
Sure you can: people who don't believe in gods. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #10
Which means precisely what, politically? rug Nov 2012 #11
It doesn't have to mean anything other than its identity. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #12
I tend to agree but that belies the premise of the OP. rug Nov 2012 #13
Not really. It could happen that the bald men with ear hair demographic Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #14
If that were the case, the reason would not be baldness. rug Nov 2012 #15
Back to the premise of this thread BlueStreak Nov 2012 #16
I'm not an atheist. rug Nov 2012 #17
No, I didn't. trotsky Nov 2012 #19
There's a good chance the next presidential election will be a woman against a man. dimbear Nov 2012 #7
How about we just let the people decide the next election Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #18
re: Promethean Nov 2012 #20
No. Not for decades; generations perhaps. Not even close. nt dmallind Nov 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Will atheists decide the ...»Reply #4