Atheism 101 Critical Thinking Class Exercise, by request!

[intaglio]

124. The antecedent is not true therefore your usage is false.

You still have not explained your use of reason/imagination as antithetical.

Your argument fails at the first hurdle - as I stated originally.

On anonymity; the use of nom de plume (or perhaps nom de guerre) are common and say nothing of your correspondent. Would you decline to argue with Eric Blair because he used a nom de plume? Perhaps you would decry Brian O'Nolan because he use several pen names. Perhaps the mathematics of Nicolas Bourbaki are invalid because of your distaste. Do you refuse to accept the pseudepigraphical writings in the Gospels?

Citing anonymity is often just an excuse to dodge argument later. On this board I am known as "intaglio" a name originally chosen for use on another message board because of its meaning and because I like the syllable pronounced in the original Italian, I find "gli" has an attractive sound. If you find this inexplicable I have two statements, "elbow" and "cellar door".