Religion
In reply to the discussion: The dictionary is wrong – science can be a religion too [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)You apparently failed to grasp the explanation that was provided here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=54496
Where it was made clear:
I never said that "really is" by itself are your words. Obviously they're not. You falsely inserted the word "exactly" (hence the italics) to dishonestly attribute something to Sagan that he never said or claimed
In other words, I directly repudiated what you said i claimed. If you couldn't grasp what I was referring to when I said "your words", I can't help you (I did predict that the subtleties would escape you).
And then you double down on your lies...how typical. Show me ANYWHERE where I have said that there are no other ways of knowing. ANYWHERE. I've challenged people here to describe the other ways of knowing that they CLAIM exist, and to show how they provide knowledge and understanding. Demanding evidence that something exists before accepting that it does is not remotely the same as asserting that it definitely does NOT exist. You don't even grasp that simple concept do you? Well, don't feel badly...you have a lot of company in this group.
If that's the best you can do to prove I'm a liar, you're sinking deep into desperation, bummy.