Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

cbayer

(146,218 posts)

6. This is a sticky wicket. While they would probably not object to actual

Reply to rug (Reply #5)

Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:09 PM

Nov 2012

medications and methods that prevent any conceptions, there are indeed those that prevent implantation after conception.

There might be a need to make this distinction, and it really would not be that hard to do.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bible Publisher Won�t Have to Fund Birth Control Coverage [View all] rug Nov 2012 OP

ok well... bunnies Nov 2012 #1

The district courts have been all over the place on these lawsuits. rug Nov 2012 #2

honestly, Id love for these jackasses to open the door bunnies Nov 2012 #4

The difference between you being forced to fund wars LARED Nov 2012 #8

That co. is Protestant and I don't recall seeing 'no birth control' CurtEastPoint Nov 2012 #3

Here's Tyndale's complaint. rug Nov 2012 #5

This is a sticky wicket. While they would probably not object to actual cbayer Nov 2012 #6

You're right. It is a necessary distinction and there are multiple fixes available. rug Nov 2012 #7