Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sigmasix

(794 posts)
42. thanks for the welcome
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 05:02 PM
Nov 2012

I spent the better part of my post adolescence and adulthood as a confirmed Atheist with an almost militant attitude towards religious thinking- I still abhore religiosity- but about 10 years ago I had an experience that answered many questions for me in a way that has brought me a great deal of intellectual satisfaction, while also making me aware of a side to my existence that I used to disregard as meaningless and a product of my environment. I know that the answers that work for me aren't the same that work for others, so I'm not much for evangelism. I find that this change was fueled by what I can only describe as an aesthetic sense of a type of beauty that comes from a life that aknowledges a faith in something that is unrestrained by the natural laws and other limits of this existence. Of course I dont expect anyone else to see my experience as proof for or against the existence of a supernatural, benign entity- but these experiences and answers are enough for me to feel sure that I am being honest with myself and not wasting effort or time on attempting to construct an intellectual circus of excuses to make inconsistencies within my world view match reality.
As I said; I used to be an Atheist, but this change in my belief structure did not entail deconstruction of my ability to recognize the intellectual pit-falls and moral conundrums presented by belief in an invisible good guy. I just require less specificity from my faithful side than from my secular side when it comes to questions about this particular natural expression of existence. I lower my expectations for specificity from my secular side and increase demands on my faithful side when I deal with questions that appear to have the supernatural realm in mind.
I am a real fan and follower of Jesus and His teachings in regards to the revolutionary act of love. I know it sounds hokey to some, but His message pierced my entire being as if I were a butterfly in a pan of wax. I disregard most religious tracts as sales brochures, but if one were to read the new testament and pay close attention to the things Jesus says, while disregarding all the bullshit written by the early church founders, it is difficult to gainsay His teachings as anything other than a revolution in human understanding and love. In fact you might say Jesus let's us know that our next stage of evolution as a species is upon us- and it is the most important one of all. We are the first creatures on earth with the ability to control our own evolution- and through the realization of revolutionary love we can control it for the better-ment of mankind.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That ought to make them some friends. hrmjustin Nov 2012 #1
Really. elleng Nov 2012 #3
I consider myself an Atheist Politicalboi Nov 2012 #2
I agree with you. There's just no point, and it's petty. MADem Nov 2012 #7
Yes I agree with you also. Really she did do some good things for the poor. Let southernyankeebelle Nov 2012 #31
What did she do for the poor outside of the occasional bowl of soup? Not much. stopbush Nov 2012 #37
About time. lalalu Nov 2012 #4
Ah, the intemperance of youth. MADem Nov 2012 #5
reminds me-septic tank needs pumping sigmasix Nov 2012 #6
Welcome to DU! rug Nov 2012 #11
"I used to be an atheist" - What changed for you? cleanhippie Nov 2012 #27
thanks for the welcome sigmasix Nov 2012 #42
They must have thought "Slavic midget" was too offensive. AlbertCat Nov 2012 #8
Fraud is one thing. Racist, bigoted epithets, another. rug Nov 2012 #9
How is any of that "racist" or "bigoted"? skepticscott Nov 2012 #12
Keep trying. rug Nov 2012 #13
So try again skepticscott Nov 2012 #14
Then surely you must not object to my referring to Hitchens as a Maltese carcass. rug Nov 2012 #15
Why would I care? skepticscott Nov 2012 #17
well when you use someone's race as an insult DonCoquixote Nov 2012 #16
So how would an Albanian skepticscott Nov 2012 #18
So ya wanna split hairs eh? DonCoquixote Nov 2012 #22
I asked for specific examples skepticscott Nov 2012 #23
did you read the article DonCoquixote Nov 2012 #40
You're right, this is not an example skepticscott Nov 2012 #46
sigh DonCoquixote Nov 2012 #53
once you defend insults based on race, it becoems a slick slope. AlbertCat Nov 2012 #32
A hate group. nt humblebum Nov 2012 #10
Have any of you ever read Hitchen's book on MT? stopbush Nov 2012 #19
This is not the place to be holding comments. Hitchens himself can easily be desribed humblebum Nov 2012 #20
Radical atheism. Did you just make that up? stopbush Nov 2012 #21
Some might have legit criticisms of Mother Teresa but I'm not listening to scum like Hitchens ButterflyBlood Nov 2012 #25
Just curious - which of Hitchens' books have you read? stopbush Nov 2012 #34
The truth or falsehood of a proposition skepticscott Nov 2012 #43
So you don't consider there to be radical atheism. humblebum Nov 2012 #52
Yeah, because Hitchens was right about so many things. cbayer Nov 2012 #30
Yes, he was right about so many things. I disagreed with him on the war, stopbush Nov 2012 #33
You know nothing about me or what I have read, so what would you know? cbayer Nov 2012 #36
And apparently, you know nothing about Hitchens' work. stopbush Nov 2012 #38
You are wrong. But one might question the credibility of one who draws cbayer Nov 2012 #39
See number 43 skepticscott Nov 2012 #44
The audacity to accuse... rexcat Nov 2012 #57
But who could live up to the high moral standard of the alcoholic war-monger, Mr Hitchens? struggle4progress Nov 2012 #24
And the fact that he drank a lot skepticscott Nov 2012 #45
Do you really need it explained to you okasha Nov 2012 #47
Do you really need it explained to you skepticscott Nov 2012 #48
The question is whether his judgement of the evidence okasha Nov 2012 #49
Unless HIS evaluation of the evidence skepticscott Nov 2012 #54
You're always good for a giggle, scottie. okasha Nov 2012 #58
And you're always good for content-free snark skepticscott Nov 2012 #61
Please don't talk about yourself that way, Scottie. okasha Nov 2012 #67
And the fact that she was short and Albanian means what? struggle4progress Nov 2012 #50
Uh, it means she was short and Albanian skepticscott Nov 2012 #55
If it wasn't for the crack about her height, it would have been perfect. Ian David Nov 2012 #26
MT was no saint. She did good work but she did plenty of bad work too. MotherPetrie Nov 2012 #28
Hateful. Sorry they choose to spend their time this way. cbayer Nov 2012 #29
Dartmouth - often known for it's childish, privileged white boy *antics*. AlbertCat Nov 2012 #35
Anyone who recognizes torture from his own personal experience of it okasha Nov 2012 #41
Um, that's kind of not what happened Goblinmonger Nov 2012 #56
Which are you denying, Goblinmonger? okasha Nov 2012 #59
So when he titled his article "Believe Me, It's Torture" Goblinmonger Nov 2012 #60
I think Hitchens had an immediate emotional response okasha Nov 2012 #66
This will certainly endear people to their cause. Drunken Irishman Nov 2012 #51
Atheists are about truth, not friends Taverner Nov 2012 #69
Then don't complain when people bitch about 'em... Drunken Irishman Nov 2012 #70
Meh, someone likes playing 'kill the messenger' Taverner Nov 2012 #71
Good. Hitchen's exposed her as the creep she was. Odin2005 Nov 2012 #62
Or vice versa cbayer Nov 2012 #65
I notice that the atheists edhopper Nov 2012 #63
You noticed that too, huh? cleanhippie Nov 2012 #64
Good on em! Taverner Nov 2012 #68
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Atheist group at Dartmout...»Reply #42