Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
13. I know you probably never go there, but the Atheist group
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 12:41 PM
Dec 2011

has a discussion right now about how we label ourselves. Most would not put them in the gnostic category except as it pertains to gods that have been named to date. Most everyone there self-identifies as an agnostic atheist in that they can't know what is out in the universe.

Again, as you probably don't know since you don't read that group, I realize that many would consider me a gnostic atheist because I have no doubt that the gods of humanity to date are not real. The truth, though, is that I don't close off all possibility of something more out there. Just not probable.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Quite honestly, if I didn't see every one of those 10 items in here consistently... trotsky Dec 2011 #1
#12 PassingFair Dec 2011 #2
And mountains. Goblinmonger Dec 2011 #3
Yeah, mountains....and BIG lakes... PassingFair Dec 2011 #4
And caves. iris27 Dec 2011 #16
And ninjas! Silent3 Dec 2011 #27
And time, one of the meanest things ever Warpy Dec 2011 #25
bookmarked to read later. nt raccoon Dec 2011 #5
He's denying the existence of gnostic atheists in #3. rug Dec 2011 #6
Yep.. Fumesucker Dec 2011 #7
I don't actually know any gnostic atheists. PassingFair Dec 2011 #9
I know you probably never go there, but the Atheist group Goblinmonger Dec 2011 #13
Is it appropriate to claim to speak for all atheists in this way? struggle4progress Dec 2011 #8
I don't have a problem with it. nt PassingFair Dec 2011 #11
Just some dude posting stuff. Goblinmonger Dec 2011 #14
not like he's making any great statements, so it's w/e. deacon_sephiroth Dec 2011 #18
I'm not speaking for all atheists. cleanhippie Dec 2011 #20
He's speaking for himself and claiming to speak for a group, some of whom would reject these claims saras Dec 2011 #10
And he has no control of the group for whom he is speaking Goblinmonger Dec 2011 #15
Maybe you can just take away from the OP what is being said. cleanhippie Dec 2011 #21
What? That atheists don't eat babies? struggle4progress Dec 2011 #22
I guess you missed the last part. cleanhippie Dec 2011 #23
The occasional baby gets eaten now and then... Silent3 Dec 2011 #28
Generally speaking i agree. rrneck Dec 2011 #12
"1) We are not a minority.... we may even be upwards to 24% of the population." - n/t Jim__ Dec 2011 #17
Did you read the next sentence? n/t Goblinmonger Dec 2011 #26
Yes. - n/t Jim__ Dec 2011 #29
Then I guess I don't understand your point. Goblinmonger Dec 2011 #30
Mary Midgley has shown #2 to be quite nonsensical and itself based on preconceptions (including the MisterP Dec 2011 #19
Thanks for posting this here. I appreciate having some.. MarkCharles Dec 2011 #24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The Top Ten Misconception...»Reply #13