Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: “Lack of belief” blurs the line between atheist and agnostic [View all]gcomeau
(5,764 posts)87. Funny, because I just did rather easily.
"OTOH, I am of the opinion that no one knows whether there is a god or gods of not."
You're welcome to that opinion. I share it.
That has absolutely squat to do with the pure irrationality of declaring that the mere *fact of not knowing* is a philosophical position denoted by the word "agnostic".
However, you can believe. You can believe there is a god or believe that there is no god.
Congratulations, another accurate but irrelevant observation.
Yes, you can adopt the position you believe God exists. Welcome to theism.
Or you can NOT ADOPT the position you believe God exists. WELCOME TO ATHEISM.
Yes, you can adopt the position *you believe* God doesn't exist. Welcome to A SUBSET of atheism.
And none of that has a damn thing to do with being agnostic, which is a completely different question that has zero, zip, zilch, NADA to do with whether you do or do not believe God exists.
"To not take either position is completely valid, imo.
Of course it's valid. It's atheism.
You're welcome to that opinion. I share it.
That has absolutely squat to do with the pure irrationality of declaring that the mere *fact of not knowing* is a philosophical position denoted by the word "agnostic".
However, you can believe. You can believe there is a god or believe that there is no god.
Congratulations, another accurate but irrelevant observation.
Yes, you can adopt the position you believe God exists. Welcome to theism.
Or you can NOT ADOPT the position you believe God exists. WELCOME TO ATHEISM.
Yes, you can adopt the position *you believe* God doesn't exist. Welcome to A SUBSET of atheism.
And none of that has a damn thing to do with being agnostic, which is a completely different question that has zero, zip, zilch, NADA to do with whether you do or do not believe God exists.
"To not take either position is completely valid, imo.
Of course it's valid. It's atheism.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I usually like this guy's writings and I really like some of Huxley's ideas on this, but
cbayer
Dec 2012
#1
But there is not a very large proportion of the human population that does believe
cbayer
Dec 2012
#91
Your refusal to post your own opinions about the subjects in your ops speaks volumes.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2012
#13
What muddying? Gnosticism is a statement on knowledge, Theism a statement on belief...
Humanist_Activist
Dec 2012
#17
It makes their job easier when they can define atheism as an active disbelief.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2012
#18
Considering it is you that rejects a specificbelief, you should say what you're rejecting.
rug
Dec 2012
#19
It must suck to realize that so many people think your religious beliefs are completely irrational.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2012
#41
Even worse, you can't point at us and scream "SEE! They believe in stupid shit too!"
beam me up scottie
Dec 2012
#43
I will never stalk someone looking for personal info to use in a debate.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2012
#49
It is not *rejecting* a belief. It's not adopting the belief. There's a difference.
gcomeau
Dec 2012
#57
You're aggravated by redefining a notion which does not accept a notion that you have no concept of?
rug
Dec 2012
#65
I don't tell you what you believe, I don't argue with you about your beliefs.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2012
#68
Calling your religious beliefs irrational is not the same thing as redefining them.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2012
#70
The point is, when one encounters a belief and does not adopt it, that is a rejection of the belief.
rug
Dec 2012
#98
Thanks for the post. Interesting article. For me, I think "agnostic" fits best, as far as labels go.
pinto
Dec 2012
#36
I'll gladly measure my obsession, as you term it, with atheism against yours with religion.
rug
Dec 2012
#59
"It's only when they attack me based on their erroneous definitions that I care"
beam me up scottie
Dec 2012
#101
Like the boring example of how the Moral Majority defines GLBT people based on their own issues?
beam me up scottie
Dec 2012
#106