How can anyone be a moderate Christian?

[struggle4progress]

3. Do you know what the logical fallacy of "equivocation" is? It is a change of the meaning of a word

used during an alleged proof, invalidating the proof

Here's a famous example:

Assertion: All governments are unjust.
Proof. Consider an arbitrary government. Obviously, being arbitrary, that government is unjust. But since an arbitrary government is unjust, all governments are unjust. QED

The fallacy here is that the meaning of "arbitrary" changed suddenly mid-discourse, so that what begins as a valid instance of the rule

P(x) => [(y) P(y)]

ends in disaster

You wish to equivocate: namely, you depend on a shifty use of "moderate"

There are other flaws in your discourse, most notably "begging the question," in which you presume results you wish to establish