Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Spiritual but not religious [View all]NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)17. And it may take you a decade sitting cross-legged in a cave
If thats important to you and you have the time, go ahead.
But remember, what is and is not "profound" is really up to each person. Assigning value on a self-induced spiritual experience vs a drug-induced one is subjective and arbitrary. In such a case, it is you, and you alone, who is standing in your way of spirituality because you are wrapping it in pre-conditions (something that priests have long practiced, by cordoning off direct communications with God and acting as intermediaries). Likewise, a None can decide that sitting in a pew isn't a profound experience because of A,B,C. But Ill refer to your earlier appeal to open-mindedness.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"I have never heard of the concept of religious leaders blocking direct access to god"
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#22
7 out of 10 cited it within the top 5 most significant spiritual experiences of their life
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#12
Well, I certainly have never made the claim that one needed a church to have a spiritual
cbayer
Dec 2012
#21