Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Spiritual but not religious [View all]NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)18. Its not either or, no
But its definitely proof you do not need a church to get there, and a church may not even get many people to the same place 7 out of the 10 people in this study went to instantly.
Why would you feel the need to exclude it, though, from spiritual or enlightening experiences that some people have.
I'm not excluding it, but rather ruling it out as a necessary (or even effective) avenue for non-religious people to try in order to experience "spirituality" themselves. There is a whole lot more bang for your buck out there; many people have already felt it already and have missed nothing (as this article implies).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"I have never heard of the concept of religious leaders blocking direct access to god"
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#22
7 out of 10 cited it within the top 5 most significant spiritual experiences of their life
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#12
Well, I certainly have never made the claim that one needed a church to have a spiritual
cbayer
Dec 2012
#21