Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

muriel_volestrangler

(106,220 posts)

2. A mistake in the digitaljournal article (blog?): not the first Buddhist in the House

Reply to rug (Original post)

Sun Jan 6, 2013, 09:14 AM

Jan 2013

The Pew article says:

Gabbard takes over the seat held in the 112th Congress by Rep. Mazie K. Hirono (D), who on Nov. 6, 2012, became the first Buddhist elected to the Senate.

In 2006, Hirono and Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) became the first Buddhists to be elected to the House. Four years later, they were joined by a third Buddhist member, Colleen Hanabusa (D-Hawaii). Johnson and Hanabusa were re-elected to serve in the 113th Congress.

http://www.pewforum.org/Government/Faith-on-the-Hill--The-Religious-Composition-of-the-113th-Congress.aspx#_ftnref2

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Religious composition of the US House & Senate revealed [View all] rug Jan 2013 OP

I call that good news..... Wounded Bear Jan 2013 #1

A mistake in the digitaljournal article (blog?): not the first Buddhist in the House muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #2

She follows the Vaishnava branch of Hinduism. rug Jan 2013 #12

No, I was talking about how it described Hirono muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #13

I misread that. rug Jan 2013 #14

I suspect that Lutheran split between GOP and Democrats tanyev Jan 2013 #3

There is a split in WA state of the Presbyterians too marlakay Jan 2013 #6

Who is the UU? (nt) ca3799 Jan 2013 #4

Ami Bera from California kmlisle Jan 2013 #9

need a majority of atheist RedstDem Jan 2013 #5

That will never happen, so you might want to look for a plan b. cbayer Jan 2013 #22

That saying is very out of date LeftishBrit Jan 2013 #27

It's not out of date yet RedstDem Jan 2013 #28

Religious composition of our gov't? Followers of Goldman Sachs. (n/t) thesquanderer Jan 2013 #7

Belief in invisible omnipotent magical beings should disqualify you from public service. nt bowens43 Jan 2013 #8

Why? rug Jan 2013 #10

Because okasha Jan 2013 #15

Thank you Mr. Lenin. Now back to our reality show. nt humblebum Jan 2013 #11

'Belief in invisible omnipotent magical beings' - You mean like the Free Market? LeftishBrit Jan 2013 #16

Believing? No. But calling on invisible omnipotent magical beings to slove the problems cleanhippie Jan 2013 #17

Thank you Mr. Lenin. Now back to our reality show. nt humblebum Jan 2013 #18

So everyone who doesn't agree with you is 'Mr Lenin' now? LeftishBrit Jan 2013 #24

Would that be Charlie McCarthy? nt humblebum Jan 2013 #29

Only as long as you get to define what an invisible, omnipotent magical being is. cbayer Jan 2013 #23

People's private beliefs should not disqualify them from office. LeftishBrit Jan 2013 #25

fascinating. thx Phillip McCleod Jan 2013 #19

More accurately reflecting the general population. cbayer Jan 2013 #20

Interesting. (aside) What I'd also love to see is occupation prior to elected position. pinto Jan 2013 #21

That would be interesting LeftishBrit Jan 2013 #26