Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
27. I'm educating you not dodging you.
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 10:33 AM
Jan 2013

The three answers are to your fist three questions.

There are many more than five religions that teach "salvation" or "liberation" whether one belongs to that religion or not.

Orthodoxy, Mormonism, Jainism and Buddhism, amog many others all teach that, although the eastern religons do not have the concept of "salvation". I suggest you read up on soteriology

As far as Catholcism goes, yor comments are simple ignorance. &quot T)he faith you most readily espouse only saves people who convert" is flat out wrong. You confuse Feeneyism with Catholicism.

&quot T)he magical operations carried out in worship are also dead letters. Why genuflect if only faith and good works are sufficient to save you? Why utter incantations in specific form?" comes straight from a Jack Chick comic and is actually a distinct topic.

Really, educate yourself.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

By not seeing any "benefits" to not believing, one falsifies the choice. cleanhippie Jan 2013 #1
Prove they are benefits NoOneMan Jan 2013 #3
Prove believing in a god is a benefit. cleanhippie Jan 2013 #10
So if I take that wager... NoOneMan Jan 2013 #2
But WHICH God did Pascal choose? Speck Tater Jan 2013 #4
And to note.... NoOneMan Jan 2013 #6
The multitude of gods has informed my choice of which one to worship bongbong Jan 2013 #7
Two problems here... LeftishBrit Jan 2013 #5
To be fair, I think he is taking issue with Jacoby's binary theist/atheist framing. rug Jan 2013 #8
I might say that the agnostic view is the only valid alternative. cleanhippie Jan 2013 #11
That is a fair distinction because it concerns gnosis. rug Jan 2013 #12
That's my reading as well. cbayer Jan 2013 #15
gee, i just invented a god that will destroy the entire planet unless you commit unspeakable acts. unblock Jan 2013 #9
A refutation of Pascal's wager. longship Jan 2013 #13
Not Pascal's idiotic bet intaglio Jan 2013 #14
I completely agree with your last two paragraphs. rug Jan 2013 #17
Oh? Which ones? Come on give some examples. intaglio Jan 2013 #18
You yourself mentioned five. rug Jan 2013 #21
Nice dodge, doesn't work intaglio Jan 2013 #22
You have a lot of misindformation but there's no dodging. rug Jan 2013 #23
Actually you are still dodging intaglio Jan 2013 #24
I'm educating you not dodging you. rug Jan 2013 #27
I asked about 2 points in respect of a woman and a man intaglio Jan 2013 #28
You seem more eager to damn people than the Church does. rug Jan 2013 #29
In my world people are not damned intaglio Jan 2013 #30
"miss-spelled"? rug Jan 2013 #31
No responses of worth? intaglio Jan 2013 #32
Which ones say that? cleanhippie Jan 2013 #20
One of the best comebacks jamtoday Jan 2013 #16
Your friend may be overestimating the divine penetration. Josephus' records dimbear Jan 2013 #25
Pascal had it ass backwards Fumesucker Jan 2013 #19
Writing about Pascal's Wager without bringing up its well-known flaws? Silent3 Jan 2013 #26
"Pascal's wager" is a sophomoric little argument struggle4progress Jan 2013 #33
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The End Game: Taking the ...»Reply #27