Religion
In reply to the discussion: Religion and evolution [View all]ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)#1 is a good place to start, I guess.
#2 seems to imply life maters more than non-life, which is obviously subjective. The existence of life is no more meaningful than the existence of helium or heat. It also seems to suggest we know all of the possible forms life can take, and we know what most of the universe is like.
#3 is also subjective. Complexity is in the eye of the beholder, and diversity probably is too.
#4 leaves room for the possibility of an unknown, supernatural force, which is fine.
#5 is fine.
#6 is a little weird to me. I deny the existence of moral law and right and wrong, as I believe the terms are being used in this article. In my opinion, the search for God is so subjective, I am not sure it should be included as a shared, human experience.